Kathrin Keil
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 31, 1988 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 4, 1988 | H2H |
| Beth Herr | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 3, 1987 | H2H |
| Louise Field | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 27, 1989 | H2H |
| Stephanie Rehe | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 14, 1988 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Kathrin Keil vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 1-0
Kathrin Keil holds a 1–0 lead over Isabel Cueto in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kathrin Keil leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kathrin Keil won the 1986 São Paulo Open round of 16 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathrin Keil | 6-2 7-6 | Isabel Cueto | Match data | Dec 12, 1986* | R16 | São Paulo Open | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathrin Keil | — | — | — | 1,703 | 45 | 55 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Isabel Cueto | #256 | #20 | 45 | 1,885 | 130 | 101 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathrin Keil | Isabel Cueto | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #29 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #31 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1984 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #117 | 1,662 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1987 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1988 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Kathrin Keil | Isabel Cueto | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 17 | 1980 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 18 | 1981 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 25 | 12 | 37 | 67.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 23 | 11 | 34 | 67.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 1983 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 23 | 11 | 34 | 67.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1984 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 22 | 11 | 33 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1986 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1987 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1988 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1989 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 27 | 32 | 59 | 45.8% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | 12 | 21 | 33 | 36.4% | 116 | 72 | 188 | 61.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Kathrin Keil | Isabel Cueto | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1509 | 106.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42.9% | -1.14 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.12 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1521 | 110.4 | — | — | — | — | +17 | +59 | — | 44.4% | -0.39 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.3 | +1.55 |
| 17 | 1980 | 1600 | 130.2 | — | — | — | — | +65 | — | — | 64.7% | +1.29 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | -0.44 | 1986 | 1539 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | -48 | +97 | — | 43.8% | -0.06 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 99.0 | +2.15 |
| 18 | 1981 | 1616 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | +61 | — | — | 52.4% | -0.12 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–1 (80%) | 101.5 | -0.42 | 1987 | 1761 | 135.7 | — | — | — | — | -187 | +64 | — | 57.5% | +0.56 | 11–1 (92%) | 3–5 (38%) | 110.5 | +3.28 |
| 19 | 1982 | 1637 | 111.3 | — | — | — | — | — | -54 | — | 53.8% | +0.15 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | -0.08 | 1988 | 1826 | 141.4 | — | — | — | — | -254 | +103 | — | 62.0% | +1.03 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–5 (29%) | 99.0 | +0.40 |
| 20 | 1983 | 1634 | 108.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.21 | 1989 | 1817 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +87 | — | 64.6% | +1.01 | 6–3 (67%) | 5–6 (45%) | 98.8 | +1.58 |
| 21 | 1984 | 1602 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -40 | — | 42.4% | -0.55 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–3 (40%) | 100.2 | +1.11 | 1990 | 1799 | 139.4 | — | — | — | — | -220 | +80 | — | 60.2% | +0.75 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–4 (56%) | 97.0 | -0.94 |
| 22 | 1985 | 1587 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 | 1991 | 1662 | 120.0 | — | — | — | — | -82 | +47 | — | 45.2% | -0.19 | 3–5 (38%) | 0–4 (0%) | 91.6 | +0.03 |
| 23 | 1986 | 1606 | 111.2 | — | — | — | — | — | -14 | — | 69.2% | +1.23 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +1.24 | 1992 | 1591 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | -65 | — | — | 0.0% | -3.67 | — | — | — | -0.24 |
| 24 | 1987 | 1631 | 122.6 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | -81 | 43.3% | -0.61 | 6–3 (67%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.7 | +0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1988 | 1579 | 111.1 | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | — | 28.1% | -1.84 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | -1.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1989 | 1536 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | -1 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.08 | 1–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1704 | 122.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -34 | -81 | 44.9% | -0.47 | 20–16 (56%) | 14–12 (54%) | 103.5 | +0.81 | — | 1885 | 137.0 | — | — | — | — | -131 | +81 | — | 55.3% | +0.47 | 36–25 (59%) | 20–30 (40%) | 95.9 | +3.33 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Isabel Cueto
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Garrone | 5 | 3 | 8 | Sep 20, 1990 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 1 | 5 | 6 | Apr 29, 1990 | H2H |
| Sandra Cecchini | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 29, 1991 | H2H |
| Katerina Maleeva | 2 | 3 | 5 | Oct 18, 1990 | H2H |
| Regina Rajchrtova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Feb 13, 1992 | H2H |