Kathrin Keil
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 31, 1988 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 4, 1988 | H2H |
| Beth Herr | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 3, 1987 | H2H |
| Louise Field | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 27, 1989 | H2H |
| Stephanie Rehe | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 14, 1988 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Kathrin Keil vs Melissa Gurney H2H: 1-0
Kathrin Keil holds a 1–0 lead over Melissa Gurney in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kathrin Keil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathrin Keil won the 1988 San Juan round of 32 6-2 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathrin Keil | 6-2 6-3 6-1 | Melissa Gurney | Match data | Oct 13, 1988* | R32 | San Juan | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathrin Keil | — | — | — | 1,703 | 45 | 55 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Melissa Gurney | #1,006 | #17 | 33 | 1,884 | 63 | 61 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathrin Keil | Melissa Gurney | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #23 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1981 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #92 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #97 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1984 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1987 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1988 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Kathrin Keil | Melissa Gurney | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 17 | 1980 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 18 | 1981 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 19 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1984 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1986 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1987 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1988 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1989 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 27 | 32 | 59 | 45.8% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | 44 | 33 | 77 | 57.1% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Kathrin Keil | Melissa Gurney | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1561 | 123.0 | — | — | — | — | +69 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.41 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.59 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1629 | 129.4 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | -65 | 48.9% | -0.04 | 0–5 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +0.14 |
| 17 | 1980 | 1600 | 130.2 | — | — | — | — | +65 | — | — | 64.7% | +1.29 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | -0.44 | 1986 | 1866 | 150.1 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -270 | -266 | 64.8% | +1.29 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.5 | +0.40 |
| 18 | 1981 | 1616 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | +61 | — | — | 52.4% | -0.12 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–1 (80%) | 101.5 | -0.42 | 1987 | 1660 | 107.0 | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | — | 43.4% | -0.53 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–3 (25%) | 96.3 | +2.75 |
| 19 | 1982 | 1637 | 111.3 | — | — | — | — | — | -54 | — | 53.8% | +0.15 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | -0.08 | 1988 | 1581 | 108.1 | — | — | — | — | +23 | -38 | — | 40.8% | -0.84 | 2–5 (29%) | 0–2 | — | +0.93 |
| 20 | 1983 | 1634 | 108.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.21 | 1989 | 1562 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.18 |
| 21 | 1984 | 1602 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -40 | — | 42.4% | -0.55 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–3 (40%) | 100.2 | +1.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1985 | 1587 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1986 | 1606 | 111.2 | — | — | — | — | — | -14 | — | 69.2% | +1.23 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +1.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1987 | 1631 | 122.6 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | -81 | 43.3% | -0.61 | 6–3 (67%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.7 | +0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1988 | 1579 | 111.1 | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | — | 28.1% | -1.84 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | -1.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1989 | 1536 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | -1 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.08 | 1–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1704 | 122.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -34 | -81 | 44.9% | -0.47 | 20–16 (56%) | 14–12 (54%) | 103.5 | +0.81 | — | 1884 | 133.3 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -137 | -180 | 52.2% | +0.24 | 10–20 (33%) | 6–9 (40%) | 91.7 | +4.02 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Melissa Gurney
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena Sukova | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 3, 1987 | H2H |
| Catherine Tanvier | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 24, 1988 | H2H |
| Elly Hakami | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 22, 1988 | H2H |
| Lea Antonoplis | 3 | 0 | 3 | Apr 18, 1987 | H2H |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 17, 1986 | H2H |