H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kathy Jordan vs Heather Ludloff H2H: 1-0
Kathy Jordan holds a 1–0 lead over Heather Ludloff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kathy Jordan leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kathy Jordan won the 1984 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1984* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Kathy Jordan | 6-1 6-1 | Heather Ludloff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Jordan | #520 | #5 | 44 | 2,092 | 249 | 155 | 61.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Heather Ludloff | #512 | #69 | 11 | 1,576 | 48 | 106 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathy Jordan | Heather Ludloff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 37–21 | 63.8% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 44–22 | 66.7% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #10 | 2,022 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #12 | 1,978 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #15 | 1,910 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,875 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #219 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |