H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kathy Jordan vs Jill Hetherington H2H: 2-0
Kathy Jordan holds a 2–0 lead over Jill Hetherington in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kathy Jordan leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Jordan won the 1990 Birmingham second round 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 61
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 1990* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Kathy Jordan | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Jill Hetherington | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1986* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Kathy Jordan | 6-1 6-3 | Jill Hetherington | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Jordan | #520 | #5 | 44 | 2,092 | 249 | 155 | 61.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jill Hetherington | #748 | #64 | 12 | 1,645 | 30 | 57 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathy Jordan | Jill Hetherington | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 37–21 | 63.8% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #386 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 44–22 | 66.7% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #81 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #10 | 2,022 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #122 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #12 | 1,978 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #247 | 1,479 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #15 | 1,910 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #277 | 1,456 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,436 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,875 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |