H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kathy Jordan vs Kate Latham H2H: 4-1

Kathy Jordan holds a 4–1 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Kathy Jordan leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1981 Richmond round of 32 7-6 3-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kathy Jordan
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 7-6 3-6 7-6 Kathy Jordan Match data Aug 13, 1981* R32 Richmond WTA 250 Hard
Kathy Jordan 6-2 6-2 Kate Latham Match data Sep 18, 1980* R32 Las Vegas WTA 250 Hard
Kathy Jordan 6-3 6-2 Kate Latham Match data Feb 15, 1980* R16 Oakland WTA 250 Carpet
Kathy Jordan 6-0 6-2 Kate Latham Match data Aug 18, 1979* QF Richmond WTA 250 Carpet
Kathy Jordan 6-2 3-6 6-2 Kate Latham Match data Jun 21, 1979* R32 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kathy Jordan #520 #5 44 2,093 249 155 61.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kathy Jordan Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1978 4–3 57.1% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1979 25–13 65.8% — 1,893 0 1 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1980 37–21 63.8% — 2,001 0 1 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1981 28–20 58.3% — 1,921 0 1 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1982 21–18 53.8% — 1,884 0 2 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1983 44–22 66.7% — 2,009 0 2 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1984 23–11 67.6% #10 2,023 0 2 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
25 1985 28–15 65.1% #12 1,979 0 2 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
26 1986 25–15 62.5% #15 1,910 0 2 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
27 1987 12–10 54.5% #35 1,892 0 2 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,874 0 2 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
30 1990 2–6 25.0% #207 1,791 0 2 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kathy Jordan Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1980 10 4 14 71.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 19 12 31 61.3% 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1981 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 11 9 20 55.0% 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1982 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1983 15 5 20 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1985 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1986 13 6 19 68.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1987 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 85 46 131 64.9% 20 18 38 52.6% 57 32 89 64.0% 87 59 146 59.6% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kathy Jordan Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1978 1561 118.9 — — — — — — +39 58.8% +0.71 1–2 (33%) — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 1894 155.9 — — — — +33 — -200 61.0% +1.00 5–3 (63%) 1–4 (20%) 104.2 +0.19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
20 1980 2001 163.9 — — — — +36 -360 -260 63.3% +0.95 5–7 (42%) 5–1 (83%) 102.2 -5.58 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1981 1921 148.1 — — — — +51 -258 -73 60.0% +0.90 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 97.1 +1.06 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
22 1982 1884 146.3 — — — — +58 -205 -59 53.2% +0.03 8–8 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 -3.84 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
23 1983 2010 155.5 — — — — -21 -247 -32 62.3% +1.00 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 103.8 -2.02 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
24 1984 2024 159.6 — — — — -49 -276 +117 65.3% +1.16 4–3 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 -2.73 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
25 1985 1979 155.4 — — — — +58 — +38 59.8% +1.02 13–5 (72%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 -2.92 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
26 1986 1911 153.3 — — — — +58 — +131 62.2% +1.00 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 96.2 -1.31 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
27 1987 1892 137.2 — — — — +45 — +97 56.3% +0.46 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 99.1 -1.65 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
29 1989 1875 106.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.26 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
30 1990 1792 109.8 — — — — +34 — +142 30.0% -1.60 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -1.37 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 2094 160.4 — — — — +32 -275 -8 59.9% +0.80 67–55 (55%) 35–31 (53%) 101.2 -5.03 — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.