H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kathy Jordan vs Kate Latham H2H: 4-1
Kathy Jordan holds a 4–1 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Kathy Jordan leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1981 Richmond third round 7-6 3-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
Age 73
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1981* | Richmond | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kate Latham | 7-6 3-6 7-6 | Kathy Jordan | Match data |
| Sep 18, 1980* | Las Vegas | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kathy Jordan | 6-2 6-2 | Kate Latham | Match data |
| Feb 15, 1980* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Kathy Jordan | 6-3 6-2 | Kate Latham | Match data |
| Aug 18, 1979* | Richmond | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Kathy Jordan | 6-0 6-2 | Kate Latham | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1979* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Kathy Jordan | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | Kate Latham | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Jordan | #520 | #5 | 44 | 2,092 | 249 | 155 | 61.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kate Latham | — | — | — | 1,866 | 198 | 202 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathy Jordan | Kate Latham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 37–21 | 63.8% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 40–16 | 71.4% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1982 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1983 | 44–22 | 66.7% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1984 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #10 | 2,022 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1985 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #12 | 1,978 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1986 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #15 | 1,910 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1987 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,875 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 24–28 | 46.2% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 6 |