H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Kathy Jordan vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-1

Kathy Jordan and Lori Mcneil are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on carpet, while Kathy Jordan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1987 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 16 6-3 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kathy Jordan
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lori Mcneil #11 6-3 4-6 6-2 Kathy Jordan #100 Match data Oct 16, 1987* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Carpet
Kathy Jordan #10 6-1 6-1 Lori Mcneil #89 Match data Jan 31, 1985* R32 Marco Island WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kathy Jordan — #5 44 2,094 249 155 61.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lori Mcneil — #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kathy Jordan Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1978 4–3 57.1% — 1,560 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1979 25–13 65.8% — 1,895 0 1 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 1980 37–21 63.8% — 2,003 0 1 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 1981 28–20 58.3% — 1,923 0 1 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1982 21–18 53.8% — 1,886 0 2 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1983 44–22 66.7% — 2,010 0 2 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 1984 23–11 67.6% #10 2,024 0 2 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 1985 28–15 65.1% — 1,979 0 2 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1986 25–15 62.5% #15 1,910 0 2 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 1987 12–10 54.5% #35 1,892 0 2 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 — — — — — — — 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,874 0 2 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1990 2–6 25.0% #207 1,791 0 2 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,671 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kathy Jordan Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1980 10 4 14 71.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 19 12 31 61.3% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1981 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 11 9 20 55.0% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1982 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 1983 15 5 20 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1985 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 1986 13 6 19 68.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1987 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 85 46 131 64.9% 20 18 38 52.6% 57 32 89 64.0% 87 59 146 59.6% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kathy Jordan Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1978 1560 118.9 — — — — — — +41 58.8% +0.71 1–2 (33%) — — +0.06 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 1979 1895 156.2 — — — — +33 — -202 61.0% +1.00 5–3 (63%) 1–4 (20%) 104.2 +0.09 1983 1569 107.2 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 1980 2003 164.4 — — — — +39 -361 -262 63.3% +0.95 5–7 (42%) 5–1 (83%) 102.2 -5.85 1984 1609 115.3 — — — — +12 -55 +9 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.32
21 1981 1923 148.5 — — — — +52 -259 -74 60.0% +0.90 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 97.2 +0.92 1985 1588 118.5 — — — — +21 -104 +4 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.23
22 1982 1886 146.5 — — — — +57 -207 -61 53.2% +0.03 8–8 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 -3.98 1986 1885 145.0 — — — — -9 -342 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.25
23 1983 2011 155.7 — — — — -21 -248 -32 62.3% +1.00 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 103.8 -2.22 1987 2007 158.5 — — — — +54 -354 -204 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.70
24 1984 2025 159.8 — — — — -49 -277 +115 65.3% +1.16 4–3 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 -2.58 1988 1902 142.7 — — — — +35 -186 +38 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +1.98
25 1985 1980 155.5 — — — — +58 — +37 59.8% +1.02 13–5 (72%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 -2.86 1989 1761 134.8 — — — — +59 -79 +78 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.28
26 1986 1911 153.4 — — — — +59 — +131 62.2% +1.00 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 96.2 -1.55 1990 1696 135.0 — — — — +13 -75 +199 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 1987 1893 137.3 — — — — +45 — +97 56.3% +0.46 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 99.1 -1.56 1991 1870 151.1 — — — — +12 -241 +44 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1962 156.9 — — — — -4 -303 +75 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 1989 1875 106.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.26 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 1990 1792 109.8 — — — — +35 — +143 30.0% -1.60 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -1.37 1994 1872 146.0 — — — — -59 -207 +243 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +385 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +310 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 2095 160.7 — — — — +33 -276 -9 59.9% +0.80 67–55 (55%) 35–31 (53%) 101.2 -5.24 — 2025 149.3 — — — — +13 -213 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.