H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kathy Jordan vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 2-2
Kathy Jordan and Mary Lou Piatek are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mary Lou Piatek leads 2–1 on carpet, while Kathy Jordan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1982 Los Angeles third round 6-1 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 1982* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-1 7-6 | Kathy Jordan | Match data |
| Aug 1, 1981* | San Diego | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Kathy Jordan | 6-1 7-6 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Jan 29, 1981* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kathy Jordan | 6-4 0-6 6-2 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1979* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-0 6-2 | Kathy Jordan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Jordan | #520 | #5 | 44 | 2,092 | 249 | 155 | 61.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kathy Jordan | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 37–21 | 63.8% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 44–22 | 66.7% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #10 | 2,022 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #12 | 1,978 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 1986 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #15 | 1,910 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 1987 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,875 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |