H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kathy Jordan vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 2-0
Kathy Jordan holds a 2–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kathy Jordan leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Kathy Jordan won the 1984 Amelia Island third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 60
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1984* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kathy Jordan | 6-2 6-1 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1984* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kathy Jordan | 6-3 6-2 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Jordan | #520 | #5 | 44 | 2,092 | 249 | 155 | 61.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nathalie Herreman | #886 | #42 | 20 | 1,728 | 103 | 154 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathy Jordan | Nathalie Herreman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 37–21 | 63.8% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1981 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #91 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 44–22 | 66.7% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #10 | 2,022 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #12 | 1,978 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #15 | 1,910 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,875 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |