H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kathy Jordan vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 1-1
Kathy Jordan and Raffaella Reggi Concato are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kathy Jordan leads 1–0 on carpet, while Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1989 Albuquerque third round 7-6 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1989* | Albuquerque | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 7-6 5-7 6-3 | Kathy Jordan | Match data |
| Oct 6, 1983* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Kathy Jordan | 6-2 6-1 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Jordan | #520 | #5 | 44 | 2,092 | 249 | 155 | 61.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathy Jordan | Raffaella Reggi Concato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1980 | 37–21 | 63.8% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1981 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1982 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1983 | 44–22 | 66.7% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1984 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #10 | 2,022 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1985 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #12 | 1,978 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1986 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #15 | 1,910 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1987 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,875 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |