H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kathy Jordan vs Terry Holladay H2H: 3-1
Kathy Jordan holds a 3–1 lead over Terry Holladay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Kathy Jordan leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Jordan won the 1985 Sydney second round 3-6 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 1985* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Kathy Jordan | 3-6 6-0 6-3 | Terry Holladay | Match data |
| Sep 5, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Kathy Jordan | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Terry Holladay | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1981* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Kathy Jordan | 6-2 7-5 | Terry Holladay | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1980* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Terry Holladay | 2-6 7-5 6-4 | Kathy Jordan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Jordan | #520 | #5 | 44 | 2,092 | 249 | 155 | 61.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Terry Holladay | #395 | #39 | 7 | 1,935 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathy Jordan | Terry Holladay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 37–21 | 63.8% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,876 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1981 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 44–22 | 66.7% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #10 | 2,022 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #12 | 1,978 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #15 | 1,910 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #50 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,875 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #103 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |