H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Ann Grossman H2H: 0-2
Ann Grossman holds a 2–0 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ann Grossman leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1992 Indian Wells fourth round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1992* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Ann Grossman | 6-1 7-5 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
| Jul 28, 1988* | Aptos | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ann Grossman | 6-3 6-0 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Ann Grossman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |