H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Annabel Croft H2H: 2-0
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 2–0 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1984 Australian Open second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 60
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 1984* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-4 6-2 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1983* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Annabel Croft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |