H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 3-0
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 3–0 lead over Catarina Lindqvist Ryan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1986 Roland Garros fourth round 6-4 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-4 (ret.) | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1985* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 5-7 6-2 6-1 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| May 18, 1985* | Berlin | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |