H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Gretchen Magers H2H: 1-2
Gretchen Magers holds a 2–1 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gretchen Magers leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gretchen Magers won the 1989 Chicago fourth round 4-6 7-6 2-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 1989* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Gretchen Magers | 4-6 7-6 2-0 (ret.) | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
| Jun 1, 1989* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Gretchen Magers | 6-2 6-3 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
| Mar 2, 1989* | San Antonio | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-4 7-6 | Gretchen Magers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Gretchen Magers | #433 | #3 | 40 | 1,905 | 152 | 127 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Gretchen Magers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #81 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #3 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #52 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #29 | 1,891 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #390 | 1,592 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |