H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Kate Gompert H2H: 1-1
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel and Kate Gompert are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Kate Gompert won the 1987 Tampa semifinal 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 1987* | Tampa | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Kate Gompert | 6-0 6-1 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1984* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | Kate Gompert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Kate Gompert | #316 | #18 | 34 | 1,870 | 85 | 81 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Kate Gompert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #175 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #301 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |