H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Katerina Maleeva H2H: 0-2
Katerina Maleeva holds a 2–0 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katerina Maleeva leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katerina Maleeva won the 1990 Indian Wells third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 57
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 1990* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Katerina Maleeva | 6-1 6-3 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
| Oct 21, 1989* | Bayonne | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Katerina Maleeva | 6-3 6-1 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Katerina Maleeva | #456 | #6 | 116 | 2,070 | 324 | 185 | 63.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Katerina Maleeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,992 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 32–11 | 74.4% | #15 | 1,940 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,039 | 0 | 9 |
| 22 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,906 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #22 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,866 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #302 | 1,679 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #231 | 1,686 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |