H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 0-2
Larisa Savchenko holds a 2–0 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Larisa Savchenko leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1996 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Larisa Savchenko | 6-3 6-3 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1986* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Larisa Savchenko | 6-2 6-2 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |