H2H data updated: 2026-10-21 00:00 UTC

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Laura Arraya H2H: 1-4

Laura Arraya holds a 4–1 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Laura Arraya leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1993 Japan Women's Open round of 16 5-7 6-3 6-2.

USA Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main-draw meetings
PER Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Arraya #63 5-7 6-3 6-2 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Feb 13, 1993* R16 Japan Women's Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Laura Arraya #24 6-2 7-6 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Aug 8, 1991* R32 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Laura Arraya #25 5-7 6-4 6-3 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Feb 3, 1991* QF Tokyo Pan Pacific Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 4-6 6-3 6-2 Laura Arraya Match data May 7, 1983* QF Perugia WTA 250 Clay
Laura Arraya 5-7 6-2 6-4 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Apr 7, 1983* R32 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — #9 — 2,083 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Laura Arraya #192 #14 51 1,922 270 204 57.0% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Laura Arraya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,803 0 2 — — — — — — —
15 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,873 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,845 0 2 — — — — — — —
17 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,851 0 2 1981 19–8 70.4% — 1,685 0 4
18 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,976 0 3 1982 33–17 66.0% — 1,741 0 7
19 1986 34–16 68.0% #9 1,975 0 4 1983 23–23 50.0% — 1,713 0 7
20 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,903 0 4 1984 29–18 61.7% #34 1,760 0 8
21 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,813 0 4 1985 17–21 44.7% #63 1,691 0 8
22 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,788 0 4 1986 23–24 48.9% #33 1,718 0 8
23 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,697 0 4 1987 16–14 53.3% #45 1,770 0 8
24 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,589 0 4 — — — — — — —
25 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4 1989 27–12 69.2% #19 1,882 0 10
26 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,628 0 4 1990 26–19 57.8% #21 1,821 0 10
27 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,585 0 4 1991 28–17 62.2% #24 1,823 0 10
28 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,609 0 4 1992 20–19 51.3% #45 1,732 0 10
29 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,555 0 4 1993 9–12 42.9% #71 1,682 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Laura Arraya
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 8 5 13 61.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 6 3 9 66.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1985 15 5 20 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1982 10 6 16 62.5% 23 10 33 69.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1986 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 1983 10 8 18 55.6% 10 11 21 47.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1987 5 2 7 71.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1984 7 7 14 50.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 9 9 18 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1989 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 3 7 10 30.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
23 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 1991 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1992 5 8 13 38.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 15 3 18 83.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 13 6 19 68.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 18 12 30 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
29 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
Career — 99 84 183 54.1% 98 59 157 62.4% 27 24 51 52.9% 49 43 92 53.3% — 105 80 185 56.8% 103 73 176 58.5% 16 14 30 53.3% 28 31 59 47.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Laura Arraya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1505 105.8 — — — — — — — 42.1% -0.42 1–0 1–1 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 1804 135.2 — — — — -9 -131 -222 61.5% +1.17 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +2.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 1873 149.1 — — — — -69 -6 -216 60.4% +0.54 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 107.8 -3.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1846 139.3 — — — — -46 +102 -186 58.6% +0.96 12–7 (63%) 1–7 (13%) 99.3 +2.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 1852 137.3 — — — — -38 +58 -144 55.9% +0.22 9–5 (64%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +0.53 1981 1686 129.2 — — — — -72 — — 65.6% +0.74 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 -1.28
18 1985 1977 159.0 — — — — -30 -57 -101 70.6% +1.53 9–2 (82%) 3–5 (38%) 105.7 -3.00 1982 1742 127.0 — — — — -62 -26 — 62.7% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 8–5 (62%) 102.3 +2.31
19 1986 1975 158.0 — — — — -2 +51 — 63.6% +1.08 8–6 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 101.3 -3.48 1983 1713 125.8 — — — — +7 +31 — 51.4% -0.24 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 95.2 +0.82
20 1987 1904 131.1 — — — — +36 +49 — 61.4% +0.60 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 100.1 +0.21 1984 1760 130.7 — — — — -102 +142 -131 53.8% +0.03 18–5 (78%) 9–4 (69%) 110.1 +0.87
21 1988 1813 123.2 — — — — +53 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -1.28 1985 1692 125.0 — — — — -1 +60 — 45.1% -0.27 8–7 (53%) 3–2 (60%) 99.8 +1.85
22 1989 1789 141.3 — — — — +18 +110 -21 50.0% -0.29 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 -4.18 1986 1719 138.2 — — — — -26 +99 — 51.0% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 100.4 -2.33
23 1990 1698 132.3 — — — — +66 +103 — 44.7% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.06 1987 1771 133.6 — — — — -31 -12 -185 51.6% +0.05 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -2.61
24 1991 1590 119.8 — — — — +56 +172 — 36.7% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–5 (0%) 93.8 +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1992 1586 115.3 — — — — -4 +158 +154 45.2% -0.50 4–8 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 92.9 +1.34 1989 1883 136.9 — — — — -7 -146 -254 65.2% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 102.9 -0.64
26 1993 1629 119.3 — — — — -56 +111 — 45.9% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 101.8 +0.90 1990 1821 142.0 — — — — +31 -55 -173 55.4% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 98.6 +0.41
27 1994 1586 107.2 — — — — -57 — — 21.4% -2.00 1–1 — — -0.20 1991 1824 132.7 — — — — +12 -70 -95 56.9% +0.19 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 105.5 +2.96
28 1995 1609 114.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.56 1992 1733 139.0 — — — — +2 +53 +3 49.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 +1.62
29 1996 1555 105.6 — — — — -33 +118 +211 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 94.7 +0.42 1993 1682 125.0 — — — — +13 +124 +9 44.0% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 2–0 — -0.06
Career — 2083 146.0 — — — — -6 +45 -86 55.0% +0.38 95–63 (60%) 41–44 (48%) 102.1 -1.29 — 1923 138.4 — — — — -10 +27 -133 54.6% +0.19 90–63 (59%) 50–44 (53%) 104.5 +0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.