H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 4-1

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 4–1 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1995 Manhattan Beach second round 2-6 6-3 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 9, 1995* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R64 Hard Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 2-6 6-3 7-6 Lori Mcneil #51 Match data
Jan 16, 1991* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Lori Mcneil #51 5-7 7-6(5) 6-1 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data
Apr 13, 1989* Amelia Island WTA 250 R32 Clay Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-1 6-3 Lori Mcneil #14 Match data
Apr 17, 1987* Amelia Island WTA 250 R16 Clay Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-3 6-1 Lori Mcneil #13 Match data
Nov 15, 1984* Brisbane WTA 500 R32 Grass Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-3 7-5 Lori Mcneil #94 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — — — 2,082 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,806 0 2 — — — — — — —
15 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,871 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,844 0 2 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,850 0 2 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,975 0 3 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1986 34–16 68.0% — 1,974 0 4 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,903 0 4 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,812 0 4 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,789 0 4 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,698 0 4 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,590 0 4 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,629 0 4 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,586 0 4 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,608 0 4 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,555 0 4 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11