H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 0-1

Mareen Louie Harper holds a 1–0 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mareen Louie Harper leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mareen Louie Harper won the 1985 Key Biscayne quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

USA Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mareen Louie Harper 6-3 6-4 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Jan 26, 1985* QF Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — #9 — 2,083 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,911 179 240 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
14 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,803 0 2 — — — — — — —
15 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,873 0 2 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,845 0 2 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,851 0 2 1978 9–13 40.9% — 1,599 0 0
18 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,976 0 3 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,575 0 0
19 1986 34–16 68.0% #9 1,975 0 4 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,719 0 0
20 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,903 0 4 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,745 0 0
21 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,813 0 4 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,656 0 0
22 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,788 0 4 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,672 0 0
23 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,697 0 4 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,734 0 1
24 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,589 0 4 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,777 0 2
25 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,680 0 2
26 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,628 0 4 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 2
27 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,585 0 4 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,613 0 2
28 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,609 0 4 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,576 0 2
29 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,555 0 4 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,614 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,545 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,537 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Mareen Louie Harper
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 1983 8 5 13 61.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1984 6 3 9 66.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1978 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1985 15 5 20 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1986 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 11 18 38.9%
20 1987 5 2 7 71.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1981 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4%
21 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 1989 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1984 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1991 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 1992 5 8 13 38.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1990 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 99 84 183 54.1% 98 59 157 62.4% 27 24 51 52.9% 49 43 92 53.3% — 106 119 225 47.1% 10 16 26 38.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 47 78 125 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Mareen Louie Harper
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1505 105.8 — — — — — — — 42.1% -0.42 1–0 1–1 — -0.02 1974 1524 102.4 — — — — +72 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 1–0 — +0.56
14 1981 1804 135.2 — — — — -9 -131 -222 61.5% +1.17 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +2.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 1873 149.1 — — — — -69 -6 -216 60.4% +0.54 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 107.8 -3.09 1976 1522 100.6 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.37
16 1983 1846 139.3 — — — — -46 +102 -186 58.6% +0.96 12–7 (63%) 1–7 (13%) 99.3 +2.67 1977 1520 116.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.35
17 1984 1852 137.3 — — — — -38 +58 -144 55.9% +0.22 9–5 (64%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +0.53 1978 1599 122.7 — — — — +32 -41 — 39.2% -0.96 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 107.4 +0.50
18 1985 1977 159.0 — — — — -30 -57 -101 70.6% +1.53 9–2 (82%) 3–5 (38%) 105.7 -3.00 1979 1576 121.8 — — — — +27 — — 30.0% -1.90 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.40
19 1986 1975 158.0 — — — — -2 +51 — 63.6% +1.08 8–6 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 101.3 -3.48 1980 1719 129.4 — — — — -38 -158 -41 46.2% -0.59 12–4 (75%) 2–6 (25%) 107.4 +1.11
20 1987 1904 131.1 — — — — +36 +49 — 61.4% +0.60 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 100.1 +0.21 1981 1746 134.8 — — — — -2 — -75 42.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 104.9 -1.67
21 1988 1813 123.2 — — — — +53 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -1.28 1982 1656 125.3 — — — — -25 -46 — 35.5% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -1.44
22 1989 1789 141.3 — — — — +18 +110 -21 50.0% -0.29 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 -4.18 1983 1672 132.3 — — — — -12 — — 42.9% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.3 -0.96
23 1990 1698 132.3 — — — — +66 +103 — 44.7% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.06 1984 1734 127.7 — — — — +24 — -95 48.8% -0.05 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 105.0 +0.48
24 1991 1590 119.8 — — — — +56 +172 — 36.7% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–5 (0%) 93.8 +0.93 1985 1778 143.9 — — — — +52 — -156 58.5% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 -0.23
25 1992 1586 115.3 — — — — -4 +158 +154 45.2% -0.50 4–8 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 92.9 +1.34 1986 1680 121.3 — — — — +20 — -64 39.1% -0.55 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 +1.36
26 1993 1629 119.3 — — — — -56 +111 — 45.9% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 101.8 +0.90 1987 1624 119.6 — — — — +7 — -16 38.6% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.21
27 1994 1586 107.2 — — — — -57 — — 21.4% -2.00 1–1 — — -0.20 1988 1614 129.2 — — — — +12 — — 43.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -0.37
28 1995 1609 114.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.56 1989 1577 117.4 — — — — -17 — -22 32.0% -1.38 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 107.4 -1.28
29 1996 1555 105.6 — — — — -33 +118 +211 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 94.7 +0.42 1990 1591 128.5 — — — — +9 — — 45.8% -0.14 2–7 (22%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 +0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1615 127.2 — — — — -4 — -50 39.4% -0.53 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.46
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1545 105.5 — — — — -7 — — 25.0% -1.81 0–2 1–0 — -0.11
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1537 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 2083 146.0 — — — — -6 +45 -86 55.0% +0.38 95–63 (60%) 41–44 (48%) 102.1 -1.29 — 1911 135.4 — — — — +8 -84 -60 42.6% -0.56 76–57 (57%) 41–42 (49%) 107.5 -0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.