H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Nana Smith H2H: 2-0
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 2–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1993 Key Biscayne first round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1993* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 7-6 6-3 | Nana Smith | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1990* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-3 7-6 | Nana Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |