H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Nana Smith H2H: 2-0

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 2–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1993 Key Biscayne round of 128 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
USA Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 7-6 6-3 Nana Smith #129 Match data Mar 13, 1993* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-3 7-6 Nana Smith #65 Match data Aug 15, 1990* R64 Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — #9 — 2,082 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Nana Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,802 0 2 — — — — — — —
15 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,872 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,844 0 2 — — — — — — —
17 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,851 0 2 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0
18 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,975 0 3 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0
19 1986 34–16 68.0% #9 1,974 0 4 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0
20 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,901 0 4 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0
21 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,811 0 4 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0
22 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,788 0 4 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0
23 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,697 0 4 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0
24 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,589 0 4 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0
25 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0
26 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,628 0 4 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0
27 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,585 0 4 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0
28 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,609 0 4 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0
29 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,554 0 4 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Nana Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 8 5 13 61.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 6 3 9 66.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1985 15 5 20 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1989 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1986 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1987 5 2 7 71.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1989 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1994 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1991 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1992 5 8 13 38.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 99 84 183 54.1% 98 59 157 62.4% 27 24 51 52.9% 49 43 92 53.3% — 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Nana Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1505 105.8 — — — — — — — 42.1% -0.42 1–0 1–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 1803 134.8 — — — — -10 -130 -221 61.5% +1.17 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +2.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 1872 149.0 — — — — -69 -6 -215 60.4% +0.54 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 107.8 -4.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1845 139.2 — — — — -45 +103 -185 58.6% +0.96 12–7 (63%) 1–7 (13%) 99.3 +3.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 1851 137.1 — — — — -38 +58 -143 55.9% +0.22 9–5 (64%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +0.60 1988 1496 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11
18 1985 1976 158.8 — — — — -30 -57 -101 70.6% +1.53 9–2 (82%) 3–5 (38%) 105.7 -2.76 1989 1588 139.3 — — — — +6 — — 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
19 1986 1975 157.9 — — — — -2 +51 — 63.6% +1.08 8–6 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 101.3 -3.03 1990 1541 113.3 — — — — +33 — -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12
20 1987 1902 131.1 — — — — +35 +51 — 61.4% +0.60 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 100.0 -0.03 1991 1529 118.1 — — — — +48 — — 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.61
21 1988 1812 123.2 — — — — +51 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -1.23 1992 1557 108.5 — — — — +41 — — 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.97
22 1989 1788 141.2 — — — — +17 +110 -20 50.0% -0.29 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 -4.08 1993 1444 90.0 — — — — +16 — — 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20
23 1990 1698 132.2 — — — — +65 +102 — 44.7% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.06 1994 1579 128.2 — — — — -1 — — 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.70
24 1991 1590 119.7 — — — — +56 +172 — 36.7% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–5 (0%) 93.8 +0.93 1995 1545 112.9 — — — — 0 — -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66
25 1992 1586 115.2 — — — — -5 +158 +152 45.2% -0.50 4–8 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 92.9 +1.34 1996 1602 121.7 — — — — +24 — — 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18
26 1993 1629 119.3 — — — — -57 +111 — 45.9% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 101.8 +0.90 1997 1543 108.6 — — — — +33 — — 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08
27 1994 1586 107.2 — — — — -57 — — 21.4% -2.00 1–1 — — -0.20 1998 1538 116.7 — — — — +45 — — 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — -0.13
28 1995 1609 114.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.56 1999 1522 112.5 — — — — +37 — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.63
29 1996 1555 105.6 — — — — -34 +118 +211 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 94.7 +0.42 2000 1499 99.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.03
Career — 2083 145.9 — — — — -6 +45 -86 55.0% +0.38 95–63 (60%) 41–44 (48%) 102.1 -1.30 — 1650 124.0 — — — — +23 — -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.