H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 2-3

Nathalie Herreman holds a 3–2 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Herreman leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1991 Wimbledon round of 128 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
USA Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Herreman #119 7-5 6-2 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Jun 26, 1991* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Nathalie Herreman #119 6-4 6-2 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Aug 31, 1988* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-2 3-6 6-3 Nathalie Herreman #54 Match data Aug 21, 1986* R32 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard
Nathalie Herreman #105 7-6 6-4 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Jun 25, 1986* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-4 6-0 Nathalie Herreman #77 Match data May 31, 1984* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — #9 — 2,082 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,802 0 2 — — — — — — —
15 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,872 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,844 0 2 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,851 0 2 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,975 0 3 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1986 34–16 68.0% #9 1,974 0 4 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,901 0 4 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,811 0 4 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,788 0 4 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,697 0 4 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,589 0 4 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,628 0 4 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,585 0 4 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,609 0 4 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,554 0 4 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 8 5 13 61.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1984 6 3 9 66.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1985 15 5 20 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1986 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1987 5 2 7 71.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1989 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1991 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1992 5 8 13 38.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 99 84 183 54.1% 98 59 157 62.4% 27 24 51 52.9% 49 43 92 53.3% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1505 105.8 — — — — — — — 42.1% -0.42 1–0 1–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 1803 134.8 — — — — -10 -130 -221 61.5% +1.17 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +2.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 1872 149.0 — — — — -69 -6 -215 60.4% +0.54 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 107.8 -4.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1845 139.2 — — — — -45 +103 -185 58.6% +0.96 12–7 (63%) 1–7 (13%) 99.3 +3.06 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 1984 1851 137.1 — — — — -38 +58 -143 55.9% +0.22 9–5 (64%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +0.60 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1985 1976 158.8 — — — — -30 -57 -101 70.6% +1.53 9–2 (82%) 3–5 (38%) 105.7 -2.76 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1986 1975 157.9 — — — — -2 +51 — 63.6% +1.08 8–6 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 101.3 -3.03 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1987 1902 131.1 — — — — +35 +51 — 61.4% +0.60 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 100.0 -0.03 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1988 1812 123.2 — — — — +51 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -1.23 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1989 1788 141.2 — — — — +17 +110 -20 50.0% -0.29 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 -4.08 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1990 1698 132.2 — — — — +65 +102 — 44.7% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.06 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1991 1590 119.7 — — — — +56 +172 — 36.7% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–5 (0%) 93.8 +0.93 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 1992 1586 115.2 — — — — -5 +158 +152 45.2% -0.50 4–8 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 92.9 +1.34 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 1993 1629 119.3 — — — — -57 +111 — 45.9% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 101.8 +0.90 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 1994 1586 107.2 — — — — -57 — — 21.4% -2.00 1–1 — — -0.20 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 1995 1609 114.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.56 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 1996 1555 105.6 — — — — -34 +118 +211 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 94.7 +0.42 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
Career — 2083 145.9 — — — — -6 +45 -86 55.0% +0.38 95–63 (60%) 41–44 (48%) 102.1 -1.30 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.