H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 2-3

Nathalie Herreman holds a 3–2 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Herreman leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1991 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 26, 1991* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Nathalie Herreman #119 7-5 6-2 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data
Aug 31, 1988* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nathalie Herreman #119 6-4 6-2 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data
Aug 21, 1986* Mahwah WTA 250 R32 Hard Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-2 3-6 6-3 Nathalie Herreman #54 Match data
Jun 25, 1986* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Nathalie Herreman #105 7-6 6-4 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data
May 31, 1984* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-4 6-0 Nathalie Herreman #77 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — — — 2,082 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,728 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,806 0 2 — — — — — — —
15 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,871 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,844 0 2 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,850 0 2 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,548 0 0
18 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,975 0 3 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,564 0 0
19 1986 34–16 68.0% — 1,974 0 4 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,543 0 0
20 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,903 0 4 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,718 0 1
21 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,812 0 4 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,641 0 1
22 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,789 0 4 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,606 0 1
23 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,698 0 4 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,590 0 4 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,684 0 1
25 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,619 0 1
26 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,629 0 4 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,586 0 4 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,622 0 1
28 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,608 0 4 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,555 0 4 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1