H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Patty Fendick H2H: 1-2
Patty Fendick holds a 2–1 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Patty Fendick leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1992 Eastbourne third round 1-6 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1992* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Patty Fendick | 1-6 6-4 6-0 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
| Mar 28, 1991* | San Antonio | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 6-0 1-0 (ret.) | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
| Feb 12, 1987* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-4 7-5 | Patty Fendick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Patty Fendick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |