H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 2-1
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 2–1 lead over Raffaella Reggi Concato in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1985 Roland Garros third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 1985* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-2 6-0 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
| Apr 19, 1984* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-1 6-1 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1983* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-1 6-2 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Raffaella Reggi Concato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |