H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 2-0

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 2–0 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1985 Lugano fourth round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 23, 1985* Lugano WTA 250 R16 Clay Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-3 6-0 Sandra Cecchini #56 Match data
May 5, 1983* Perugia WTA 250 R32 Clay Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 5-7 6-4 6-0 Sandra Cecchini Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — — — 2,082 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,806 0 2 — — — — — — —
15 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,871 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,844 0 2 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,850 0 2 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,975 0 3 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1986 34–16 68.0% — 1,974 0 4 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,903 0 4 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,812 0 4 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,789 0 4 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,698 0 4 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,590 0 4 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,629 0 4 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,586 0 4 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,608 0 4 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,555 0 4 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11