H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Katja Ebbinghaus vs Fiorella Bonicelli H2H: 1-1
Katja Ebbinghaus and Fiorella Bonicelli are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Katja Ebbinghaus won the 1972 Gstaad fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1972* | Gstaad | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Katja Ebbinghaus | 6-1 6-4 | Fiorella Bonicelli | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1972* | Nice | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Fiorella Bonicelli | 4-6 6-1 6-1 | Katja Ebbinghaus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katja Ebbinghaus | — | — | — | 1,873 | 173 | 143 | 54.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Fiorella Bonicelli | — | — | — | 1,866 | 135 | 97 | 58.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katja Ebbinghaus | Fiorella Bonicelli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 12–10 | 54.5% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1968 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1969 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 11 |
| 22 | 1970 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1972 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 12 |
| 25 | 1973 | 14–13 | 51.9% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,763 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 1974 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1975 | 19–14 | 57.6% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1976 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1977 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1978 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 1979 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 1981 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1982 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |