H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katja Ebbinghaus vs Florenta Mihai H2H: 2-1
Katja Ebbinghaus holds a 2–1 lead over Florenta Mihai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Florenta Mihai leads 1–0 on carpet, while Katja Ebbinghaus leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Katja Ebbinghaus won the 1980 Stuttgart third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1980* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | — | Katja Ebbinghaus | 6-3 6-0 | Florenta Mihai | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1978* | Boston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Florenta Mihai | 6-3 0-6 6-4 | Katja Ebbinghaus | Match data |
| May 14, 1977* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Katja Ebbinghaus | 6-1 6-3 | Florenta Mihai | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katja Ebbinghaus | — | — | — | 1,873 | 173 | 143 | 54.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Florenta Mihai | — | — | — | 1,803 | 93 | 90 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katja Ebbinghaus | Florenta Mihai | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1968 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1969 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1970 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1972 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1973 | 14–13 | 51.9% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 30–13 | 69.8% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1974 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1975 | 19–14 | 57.6% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1976 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1977 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1978 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1979 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1981 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1982 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |