H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Katja Ebbinghaus vs Florenta Mihai H2H: 2-1

Katja Ebbinghaus holds a 2–1 lead over Florenta Mihai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Florenta Mihai leads 1–0 on carpet, while Katja Ebbinghaus leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Katja Ebbinghaus won the 1980 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 32 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Katja Ebbinghaus
FRG Age 78
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Florenta Mihai
ROU

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Katja Ebbinghaus 6-3 6-0 Florenta Mihai Match data Aug 30, 1980* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 —
Florenta Mihai 6-3 0-6 6-4 Katja Ebbinghaus Match data Mar 16, 1978* R32 Boston WTA 250 Carpet
Katja Ebbinghaus 6-1 6-3 Florenta Mihai Match data May 14, 1977* QF Hamburg Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Katja Ebbinghaus — — — 1,878 179 146 55.1% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Florenta Mihai — — — 1,799 89 90 49.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Katja Ebbinghaus Florenta Mihai
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1974 3–2 60.0% — 1,515 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1975 4–5 44.4% — 1,508 0 0
20 1968 4–6 40.0% — 1,493 0 0 1976 13–16 44.8% — 1,634 0 0
21 1969 10–9 52.6% — 1,559 0 0 1977 16–13 55.2% — 1,774 0 1
22 1970 4–5 44.4% — 1,577 0 0 1978 7–20 25.9% — 1,642 0 1
23 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,592 0 0 1979 7–9 43.8% — 1,615 0 1
24 1972 24–12 66.7% — 1,832 0 2 1980 7–9 43.8% — 1,578 0 1
25 1973 16–14 53.3% — 1,814 0 2 1981 30–13 69.8% — 1,652 0 3
26 1974 19–17 52.8% — 1,779 0 3 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,618 0 3
27 1975 19–14 57.6% — 1,838 0 3 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,624 0 3
28 1976 10–9 52.6% — 1,765 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1977 26–14 65.0% — 1,819 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1978 6–16 27.3% — 1,690 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1979 3–4 42.9% — 1,652 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,710 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1981 3–5 37.5% — 1,672 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 1982 3–1 75.0% — 1,679 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Katja Ebbinghaus Florenta Mihai
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1968 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1976 — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0%
21 1969 — — — — 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1977 2 5 7 28.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1970 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
23 1971 — — — — 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1979 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1972 2 1 3 66.7% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1980 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1973 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1981 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1974 0 3 3 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 1982 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
27 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 20 9 29 69.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 0 3 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1980 — — — — 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1981 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1982 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 4 11 15 26.7% 132 88 220 60.0% 11 19 30 36.7% 15 17 32 46.9% — 3 10 13 23.1% 39 27 66 59.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 9 22 31 29.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Katja Ebbinghaus Florenta Mihai
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1516 105.0 — — — — — +18 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 0–1 — +1.34
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1509 103.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.60 0–2 1–1 — +1.56
20 1968 1494 106.8 — — — — — -1 — 47.8% -0.30 0–3 (0%) — — -0.04 1976 1634 124.5 — — — — -65 +1 -51 41.8% -0.45 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 107.6 +0.91
21 1969 1559 120.0 — — — — +58 -14 — 53.5% +0.37 2–3 (40%) — — +0.60 1977 1774 133.4 — — — — -215 +53 — 52.9% +0.04 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 106.6 +0.88
22 1970 1577 112.4 — — — — — +12 — 42.9% -0.48 2–1 (67%) — — +0.41 1978 1643 119.2 — — — — -37 +89 -110 25.9% -1.90 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.0 -1.87
23 1971 1593 120.8 — — — — — -4 -15 54.3% +0.37 1–7 (13%) — — +1.77 1979 1615 118.8 — — — — -69 — -31 43.3% -0.43 1–1 0–1 — +0.94
24 1972 1832 145.6 — — — — -229 +82 -272 65.5% +0.91 5–7 (42%) 0–2 — -2.05 1980 1579 102.2 — — — — — +168 -47 47.5% -0.47 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 95.7 +1.23
25 1973 1815 136.7 — — — — -146 +69 — 54.9% +0.10 4–7 (36%) 2–0 — -2.33 1981 1652 129.6 — — — — — +130 — 67.7% +1.51 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 99.8 +2.54
26 1974 1780 126.8 — — — — -223 +72 -178 56.0% +0.31 3–4 (43%) 6–3 (67%) 99.3 -0.63 1982 1618 104.2 — — — — — +106 — 50.0% +0.38 0–2 — — +0.59
27 1975 1839 139.4 — — — — — +58 — 56.0% +0.24 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 103.7 -1.26 1983 1625 105.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 — — +0.05
28 1976 1765 129.1 — — — — — +92 -152 51.2% +0.30 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1977 1820 138.1 — — — — -237 +104 -212 60.2% +0.77 9–4 (69%) 1–4 (20%) 101.2 +0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1978 1690 126.2 — — — — -129 +163 -112 33.3% -1.17 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.8 -1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1979 1653 108.5 — — — — -66 — — 43.8% -0.63 1–1 1–0 — +1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1980 1711 128.6 — — — — — +76 — 62.3% +1.20 6–3 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 +1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1981 1673 109.0 — — — — — +131 — 53.8% +0.69 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1982 1680 106.2 — — — — — +114 — 75.0% +1.50 — — — +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1878 138.4 — — — — -149 +67 -146 55.2% +0.35 47–53 (47%) 20–20 (50%) 97.1 +0.09 — 1800 126.9 — — — — -97 +66 -73 49.3% -0.08 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 101.3 +4.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.