H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Katja Ebbinghaus vs Kay Mcdaniel H2H: 0-1
Kay Mcdaniel holds a 1–0 lead over Katja Ebbinghaus in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kay Mcdaniel leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kay Mcdaniel won the 1979 Wimbledon first round 7-5 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1979* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Kay Mcdaniel | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | Katja Ebbinghaus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katja Ebbinghaus | — | — | — | 1,873 | 173 | 143 | 54.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Kay Mcdaniel | — | — | — | 1,653 | 18 | 40 | 31.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katja Ebbinghaus | Kay Mcdaniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1968 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1969 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1970 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1972 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1973 | 14–13 | 51.9% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1974 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1975 | 19–14 | 57.6% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1976 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1977 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1978 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1979 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1981 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1982 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |