H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Katja Ebbinghaus vs Rosie Reyes H2H: 1-0
Katja Ebbinghaus holds a 1–0 lead over Rosie Reyes in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Katja Ebbinghaus leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Katja Ebbinghaus won the 1975 Rome third round 6-2 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1975* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Katja Ebbinghaus | 6-2 2-6 6-1 | Rosie Reyes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katja Ebbinghaus | — | — | — | 1,873 | 173 | 143 | 54.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Rosie Reyes | — | — | — | 1,650 | 35 | 34 | 50.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katja Ebbinghaus | Rosie Reyes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1968 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1969 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1970 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1972 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1973 | 14–13 | 51.9% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1974 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1975 | 19–14 | 57.6% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1976 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1977 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 19–10 | 65.5% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1978 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1979 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1981 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 1982 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 4 |