H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katrina Adams vs Donna Faber H2H: 1-1
Katrina Adams and Donna Faber are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Donna Faber leads 1–0 on carpet, while Katrina Adams leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Donna Faber won the 1989 Chicago third round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1989* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Donna Faber | 7-6 6-4 | Katrina Adams | Match data |
| Apr 27, 1989* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Katrina Adams | 3-6 7-6 6-3 | Donna Faber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katrina Adams | #625 | #67 | 199 | 1,608 | 55 | 114 | 32.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katrina Adams | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #84 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #256 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1992 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #143 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1993 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #144 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #116 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #115 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #278 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #625 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |