H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Katrina Adams vs Donna Faber H2H: 1-1

Katrina Adams and Donna Faber are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Donna Faber leads 1–0 on carpet, while Katrina Adams leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Donna Faber won the 1989 Chicago round of 32 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Katrina Adams
USA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Donna Faber
USA Age 55

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Donna Faber #59 7-6 6-4 Katrina Adams #88 Match data Nov 9, 1989* R32 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Katrina Adams #69 3-6 7-6 6-3 Donna Faber #81 Match data Apr 27, 1989* R32 Houston WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Katrina Adams #625 #67 199 1,607 55 114 32.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Donna Faber #227 #55 19 1,718 68 97 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Katrina Adams Donna Faber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #218 1,495 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 6–9 40.0% #131 1,532 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 19–19 50.0% #59 1,674 0 0
18 1987 1–3 25.0% #167 1,484 0 0 1990 15–18 45.5% #84 1,630 0 0
19 1988 10–15 40.0% #96 1,539 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,593 0 0
20 1989 14–25 35.9% #84 1,573 0 0 1992 11–20 35.5% #116 1,541 0 0
21 1990 1–11 8.3% #256 1,470 0 0 1993 1–10 9.1% #227 1,431 0 0
22 1991 7–7 50.0% #91 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1992 6–15 28.6% #143 1,537 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1993 4–10 28.6% #184 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1994 2–7 22.2% #144 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1995 3–8 27.3% #116 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1996 7–10 41.2% #115 1,555 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1997 0–2 0.0% #278 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1998 0–1 0.0% #625 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Katrina Adams Donna Faber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 15 10 25 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1987 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 5 7 12 41.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1988 6 7 13 46.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1989 8 12 20 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 1992 8 12 20 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1990 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1991 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1995 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 5 4 9 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34 51 85 40.0% 3 21 24 12.5% 13 20 33 39.4% 5 22 27 18.5% — 42 53 95 44.2% 19 29 48 39.6% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Katrina Adams Donna Faber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1496 103.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.17 — — — +0.11
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1532 112.2 — — — — +4 +14 — 40.6% -0.63 1–1 1–1 — +0.30
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1675 137.0 — — — — +40 -169 -99 48.9% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 +1.23
18 1987 1485 104.6 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.25 — — — +0.42 1990 1631 115.4 — — — — -7 -19 -43 43.1% -0.68 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.90
19 1988 1540 107.3 — — — — +17 -104 +79 41.1% -0.98 3–3 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 104.1 +0.75 1991 1593 109.9 — — — — -20 +38 +10 41.3% -0.77 9–3 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 106.2 +1.62
20 1989 1573 119.5 — — — — +5 -143 +43 38.0% -0.89 9–7 (56%) 8–9 (47%) 105.7 +0.11 1992 1542 119.9 — — — — +26 +37 — 38.0% -0.77 4–5 (44%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.56
21 1990 1471 103.4 — — — — -8 — +146 21.4% -1.64 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.7 +0.18 1993 1432 94.2 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -2.12 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 +0.77
22 1991 1572 124.7 — — — — -6 — — 44.1% -0.76 5–1 (83%) 5–1 (83%) 110.6 +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 1538 111.1 — — — — +21 -145 +41 29.5% -1.59 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.5 +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 1531 120.1 — — — — -36 -85 +137 35.3% -1.24 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 102.7 -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1994 1512 124.6 — — — — +10 — — 30.4% -0.39 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 100.9 -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1995 1508 111.9 — — — — +22 — — 30.8% -1.54 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 1555 119.5 — — — — +44 -140 +1 43.9% -0.63 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 1525 99.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 1515 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1607 121.2 — — — — +9 -122 +69 35.5% -1.08 27–31 (47%) 24–22 (52%) 107.7 +1.07 — 1719 121.4 — — — — +14 -11 -44 41.2% -0.60 26–20 (57%) 13–17 (43%) 103.5 +3.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.