H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Katrina Adams vs Nana Smith H2H: 0-1

Nana Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Katrina Adams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nana Smith leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1990 Tokyo Pan Pacific round of 32 6-2 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Katrina Adams
USA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nana Smith #105 6-2 3-6 6-3 Katrina Adams #82 Match data Feb 1, 1990* R32 Tokyo Pan Pacific Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Katrina Adams #625 #67 199 1,607 55 114 32.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Katrina Adams Nana Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0
18 1987 1–3 25.0% #167 1,484 0 0 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0
19 1988 10–15 40.0% #96 1,539 0 0 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0
20 1989 14–25 35.9% #84 1,573 0 0 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0
21 1990 1–11 8.3% #256 1,470 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0
22 1991 7–7 50.0% #91 1,571 0 0 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0
23 1992 6–15 28.6% #143 1,537 0 0 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0
24 1993 4–10 28.6% #184 1,531 0 0 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0
25 1994 2–7 22.2% #144 1,511 0 0 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0
26 1995 3–8 27.3% #116 1,507 0 0 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0
27 1996 7–10 41.2% #115 1,555 0 0 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0
28 1997 0–2 0.0% #278 1,524 0 0 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0
29 1998 0–1 0.0% #625 1,515 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Katrina Adams Nana Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1987 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1988 6 7 13 46.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1989 8 12 20 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1990 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1991 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1992 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1994 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1993 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1995 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1996 5 4 9 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 1997 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 34 51 85 40.0% 3 21 24 12.5% 13 20 33 39.4% 5 22 27 18.5% — 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Katrina Adams Nana Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1496 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11
18 1987 1485 104.6 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.25 — — — +0.42 1989 1588 139.3 — — — — +6 — — 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
19 1988 1540 107.3 — — — — +17 -104 +79 41.1% -0.98 3–3 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 104.1 +0.75 1990 1541 113.3 — — — — +33 — -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12
20 1989 1573 119.5 — — — — +5 -143 +43 38.0% -0.89 9–7 (56%) 8–9 (47%) 105.7 +0.11 1991 1529 118.1 — — — — +48 — — 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.61
21 1990 1471 103.4 — — — — -8 — +146 21.4% -1.64 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.7 +0.18 1992 1557 108.5 — — — — +41 — — 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.97
22 1991 1572 124.7 — — — — -6 — — 44.1% -0.76 5–1 (83%) 5–1 (83%) 110.6 +0.43 1993 1444 90.0 — — — — +16 — — 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20
23 1992 1538 111.1 — — — — +21 -145 +41 29.5% -1.59 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.5 +0.39 1994 1579 128.2 — — — — -1 — — 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.70
24 1993 1531 120.1 — — — — -36 -85 +137 35.3% -1.24 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 102.7 -0.13 1995 1545 112.9 — — — — 0 — -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66
25 1994 1512 124.6 — — — — +10 — — 30.4% -0.39 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 100.9 -0.56 1996 1602 121.7 — — — — +24 — — 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18
26 1995 1508 111.9 — — — — +22 — — 30.8% -1.54 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.29 1997 1543 108.6 — — — — +33 — — 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08
27 1996 1555 119.5 — — — — +44 -140 +1 43.9% -0.63 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — -0.18 1998 1538 116.7 — — — — +45 — — 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — -0.13
28 1997 1525 99.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.20 1999 1522 112.5 — — — — +37 — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.63
29 1998 1515 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.10 2000 1499 99.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.03
Career — 1607 121.2 — — — — +9 -122 +69 35.5% -1.08 27–31 (47%) 24–22 (52%) 107.7 +1.07 — 1650 124.0 — — — — +23 — -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.