H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Kay Mcdaniel vs Connie Pearson H2H: 1-0

Kay Mcdaniel holds a 1–0 lead over Connie Pearson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kay Mcdaniel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kay Mcdaniel won the 1974 Sebring round of 32 6-3 6-4.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kay Mcdaniel 6-3 6-4 Connie Pearson Match data Mar 7, 1974* R32 Sebring WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kay Mcdaniel 1,653 18 40 31.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Connie Pearson 1,511 5 15 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Kay Mcdaniel Connie Pearson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1974 2–1 66.7% 1,515 0 0 1968 0–1 0.0% 0 0
1976 0–1 0.0% 1,498 0 0 1971 0–1 0.0% 1,493 0 0
1977 0–1 0.0% 1,485 0 0 1972 2–2 50.0% 1,500 0 0
1978 2–2 50.0% 1,520 0 0 1973 0–2 0.0% 1,464 0 0
1979 10–12 45.5% 1,625 0 0 1974 3–8 27.3% 1,425 0 0
1980 2–12 14.3% 1,554 0 0 1975 0–1 0.0% 1,423 0 0
1981 0–2 0.0% 1,528 0 0
1982 1–3 25.0% 1,501 0 0
1985 1–2 33.3% 1,484 0 0
1986 0–3 0.0% 1,453 0 0
1987 0–1 0.0% 1,447 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Kay Mcdaniel Connie Pearson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1974 2 1 3 66.7% 1968 0 1 1 0.0%
1978 2 2 4 50.0% 1971 0 1 1 0.0%
1979 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1980 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1973 0 2 2 0.0%
1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1974 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1982 1 3 4 25.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0%
1986 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1987 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 7 13 20 35.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 9 11 18.2% Career 1 4 5 20.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Kay Mcdaniel Connie Pearson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1974 1516 99.4 +25 57.1% -0.28 1–0 +0.38 1971 1494 100.0 33.3% -2.00 0–1 -0.08
1976 1498 99.0 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 0.00 1972 1500 92.9 44.4% -1.22 1–0 +0.72
1977 1486 99.4 0.0% -3.00 -0.04 1973 1464 93.7 0.0% -3.25 0–1 +0.76
1978 1520 109.0 +104 55.6% +0.78 0–1 0–1 +0.20 1974 1425 90.4 +43 26.1% -1.61 1–0 2–3 (40%) +0.95
1979 1625 126.4 +23 +26 43.4% -0.57 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 +0.41 1975 1424 103.4 0.0% -4.00 -0.16
1980 1555 99.2 -19 +36 21.9% -2.47 1–3 (25%) 2–0 -0.34
1981 1528 94.7 0.0% -4.25 -0.09
1982 1501 104.3 +21 40.0% -0.30 0–2 1–1 +0.49
1985 1485 96.2 33.3% -1.33 1–0 +0.03
1986 1454 95.8 14.3% -2.14 0–1 +0.25
1987 1447 99.8 0.0% -3.50 +0.02
Career 1653 110.7 +19 +25 +29 34.8% -1.20 8–11 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 103.3 +2.26 Career 1512 91.3 +43 26.8% -1.83 2–1 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 100.2 +11.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.