H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kaye Hallam vs Elizabeth Little H2H: 0-1

Elizabeth Little holds a 1–0 lead over Kaye Hallam in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elizabeth Little leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elizabeth Little won the 1979 Beckenham round of 64 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kaye Hallam
AUS Age 69
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Elizabeth Little
AUS Age 65

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elizabeth Little 6-4 6-3 Kaye Hallam Match data Jun 6, 1979* R64 Beckenham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kaye Hallam — — — 1,524 20 34 37.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Elizabeth Little — — — 1,622 18 19 48.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kaye Hallam Elizabeth Little
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,481 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1977 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
17 1974 2–4 33.3% — 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1975 2–5 28.6% — 1,469 0 0 1979 5–7 41.7% — 1,478 0 0
19 1976 2–4 33.3% — 1,467 0 0 1980 6–6 50.0% — 1,525 0 1
20 1977 6–9 40.0% — 1,501 0 0 1981 5–3 62.5% — 1,613 0 1
21 1978 1–3 25.0% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1979 7–9 43.8% — 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kaye Hallam Elizabeth Little
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 1974 — — — — — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1979 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — —
20 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
21 1978 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1979 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 0 1 1 0.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 19 27 29.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 14 12 26 53.8% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kaye Hallam Elizabeth Little
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1481 93.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.90
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1498 102.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.13
17 1974 1500 98.2 — — — — — — +48 33.3% -2.17 — — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 1470 99.2 — — — — — +66 +18 37.5% -0.81 0–2 — — +0.89 1979 1479 98.4 — — — — — +48 +58 43.3% -0.40 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +2.24
19 1976 1468 102.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.39 1980 1525 112.9 — — — — — — +54 45.8% -0.42 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.54
20 1977 1501 105.5 — — — — +35 — -29 38.2% -1.03 3–1 (75%) — — +1.01 1981 1613 114.3 — — — — — — +91 50.0% -0.69 2–0 1–0 — -0.20
21 1978 1492 105.3 — — — — — — -23 30.0% -1.80 1–1 1–0 — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1979 1490 99.7 — — — — — +65 -26 41.9% -0.71 0–1 0–1 — +2.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1525 102.8 — — — — +35 +65 -3 37.4% -1.06 4–5 (44%) 2–3 (40%) 99.5 +9.00 — 1623 107.5 — — — — — +48 +67 45.0% -0.56 6–4 (60%) 4–2 (67%) 105.5 +10.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.