H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kerry Reid vs Kate Latham H2H: 2-2
Kerry Reid and Kate Latham are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1979 Phoenix quarterfinal 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1979* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Kate Latham | 7-6 6-3 | Kerry Reid | Match data |
| Sep 14, 1979* | Tokyo Sillook | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kerry Reid | 6-3 6-3 | Kate Latham | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1974* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Kerry Reid | 6-3 7-6 | Kate Latham | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1974* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Kate Latham | (w/o) | Kerry Reid | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerry Reid | — | — | — | 2,215 | 586 | 245 | 70.5% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Kate Latham | — | — | — | 1,866 | 198 | 202 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kerry Reid | Kate Latham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1968 | 25–10 | 71.4% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1969 | 66–22 | 75.0% | — | 1,893 | 0 | 8 | 1974 | 40–16 | 71.4% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1970 | 77–26 | 74.8% | — | 2,003 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1971 | 55–27 | 67.1% | — | 2,154 | 0 | 14 | 1976 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1972 | 59–25 | 70.2% | — | 2,031 | 0 | 16 | 1977 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1973 | 63–23 | 73.3% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 17 | 1978 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1974 | 52–14 | 78.8% | — | 2,208 | 0 | 18 | 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1975 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 2,054 | 0 | 18 | 1980 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1976 | 28–12 | 70.0% | — | 2,072 | 0 | 19 | 1981 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1977 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 2,076 | 1 | 20 | 1982 | 24–28 | 46.2% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1978 | 53–25 | 67.9% | — | 2,076 | 1 | 21 | 1983 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1979 | 50–23 | 68.5% | — | 2,022 | 1 | 22 | 1984 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,984 | 1 | 22 | 1985 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,982 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,954 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,945 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |