H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kerry Reid vs Penny Moor H2H: 3-0
Kerry Reid holds a 3–0 lead over Penny Moor in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kerry Reid leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kerry Reid won the 1972 Phoenix third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1972* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kerry Reid | 6-0 6-1 | Penny Moor | Match data |
| Apr 7, 1972* | Jacksonville | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kerry Reid | 7-5 6-3 | Penny Moor | Match data |
| May 22, 1970* | Wolverhampton | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Kerry Reid | 6-3 6-3 | Penny Moor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerry Reid | — | — | — | 2,215 | 586 | 245 | 70.5% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Penny Moor | — | — | — | 1,552 | 53 | 111 | 32.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kerry Reid | Penny Moor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1968 | 25–10 | 71.4% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1969 | 66–22 | 75.0% | — | 1,893 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 9–20 | 31.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1970 | 77–26 | 74.8% | — | 2,003 | 0 | 11 | 1974 | 7–21 | 25.0% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1971 | 55–27 | 67.1% | — | 2,154 | 0 | 14 | 1975 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1972 | 59–25 | 70.2% | — | 2,031 | 0 | 16 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1973 | 63–23 | 73.3% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 17 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1974 | 52–14 | 78.8% | — | 2,208 | 0 | 18 | 1978 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1975 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 2,054 | 0 | 18 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1976 | 28–12 | 70.0% | — | 2,072 | 0 | 19 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,395 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1977 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 2,076 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1978 | 53–25 | 67.9% | — | 2,076 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1979 | 50–23 | 68.5% | — | 2,022 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,984 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,982 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,954 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,945 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |