H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kiki Bertens vs Aleksandra Krunic H2H: 3-0

Kiki Bertens holds a 3–0 lead over Aleksandra Krunic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kiki Bertens leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2019 Palermo second round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kiki Bertens
NED Age 34 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Aleksandra Krunic
Serbia Age 33 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kiki Bertens #5 6-3 6-1 Aleksandra Krunic #103 Match data Jul 26, 2019* R16 Palermo International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Kiki Bertens #27 6-4 6-2 Aleksandra Krunic #50 Match data Apr 5, 2018* R32 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Kiki Bertens #35 6-3 6-1 Aleksandra Krunic #93 Match data Jul 20, 2017* R32 Ladies Championship Gstaad International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kiki Bertens #25 #4 5,430 2,004 216 172 55.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11
Aleksandra Krunic #470 #39 1,210 1,771 87 120 42.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kiki Bertens Aleksandra Krunic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2011 2–2 50.0% #223 1,504 0 0
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #182 1,493 0 0 2012 2–1 66.7% #165 1,525 0 0
20 2012 11–12 47.8% #63 1,580 0 1 2013 0–4 0.0% #151 1,463 0 0
21 2013 14–19 42.4% #87 1,551 0 1 2014 5–6 45.5% #87 1,523 0 0
22 2014 11–14 44.0% #68 1,579 0 1 2015 12–19 38.7% #108 1,543 0 0
23 2015 7–17 29.2% #104 1,520 0 1 2016 4–12 25.0% #144 1,595 0 0
24 2016 26–20 56.5% #22 1,689 0 2 2017 20–13 60.6% #54 1,753 0 1
25 2017 30–26 53.6% #31 1,696 0 5 2018 20–23 46.5% #55 1,713 0 2
26 2018 46–23 66.7% #9 1,911 0 8 2019 5–14 26.3% #163 1,556 0 2
27 2019 57–26 68.7% #9 1,897 0 10 — — — — — — —
28 2020 13–6 68.4% #9 1,882 0 11 2021 6–6 50.0% #128 1,643 0 2
29 2021 1–8 11.1% #25 1,733 0 11 2022 9–10 47.4% #115 1,635 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2024 2–7 22.2% #286 1,603 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2025 0–3 0.0% #468 1,565 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kiki Bertens Aleksandra Krunic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2013 5 8 13 38.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2014 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2014 5 10 15 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
23 2015 3 12 15 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2016 7 14 21 33.3% 17 5 22 77.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2017 11 8 19 57.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — —
25 2017 7 16 23 30.4% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2018 8 15 23 34.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
26 2018 26 15 41 63.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2019 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2019 30 18 48 62.5% 18 5 23 78.3% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 10 3 13 76.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2021 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2022 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 98 107 205 47.8% 95 45 140 67.9% 20 19 39 51.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — 41 69 110 37.3% 33 39 72 45.8% 13 12 25 52.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 361/388 of Kiki Bertens's and 187/204 of Aleksandra Krunic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kiki Bertens Aleksandra Krunic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 2/4 3.0 1.0 64.4% 78.7% 70.1% 50.0% 58.3% 75.8% 52.6%
19 2011 1/1 3.0 5.0 53.7% 61.1% 32.3% 50.0% 42.9% 47.8% 40.9% 2012 3/3 2.0 6.3 48.1% 63.1% 40.4% 51.5% 68.5% 51.0% 50.8%
20 2012 23/23 2.9 4.1 60.5% 65.3% 41.1% 49.3% 48.2% 55.7% 42.3% 2013 4/4 1.3 4.5 48.9% 59.7% 50.2% 45.6% 42.5% 54.7% 42.6%
21 2013 30/33 2.2 5.5 57.6% 61.8% 42.9% 51.9% 45.5% 54.1% 43.7% 2014 9/11 3.2 4.1 56.7% 64.0% 45.1% 44.4% 49.5% 55.7% 39.9%
22 2014 22/25 2.7 4.0 58.1% 60.8% 44.5% 49.6% 41.8% 53.8% 45.8% 2015 23/31 2.6 2.6 57.1% 60.9% 48.4% 49.1% 45.7% 54.9% 37.5%
23 2015 19/24 1.9 5.1 63.9% 59.1% 51.6% 53.8% 57.3% 56.1% 36.8% 2016 15/16 1.3 2.3 63.0% 58.0% 43.8% 35.6% 38.2% 52.8% 42.1%
24 2016 45/46 3.8 3.4 60.1% 67.4% 47.6% 55.6% 44.9% 59.0% 46.0% 2017 32/33 2.2 1.9 63.6% 64.5% 50.3% 51.1% 51.6% 59.5% 48.5%
25 2017 54/56 4.5 4.4 55.5% 71.4% 43.7% 54.1% 50.0% 59.1% 45.9% 2018 40/43 1.6 2.2 63.4% 61.4% 49.2% 52.9% 39.9% 56.5% 43.2%
26 2018 64/69 4.8 4.0 58.0% 69.1% 47.9% 51.8% 51.7% 60.0% 46.8% 2019 19/19 1.1 2.1 63.0% 56.1% 47.8% 53.8% 36.9% 52.9% 39.4%
27 2019 76/83 5.6 4.4 57.1% 72.6% 47.2% 58.5% 48.8% 61.8% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 19/19 4.2 3.8 63.7% 68.3% 43.5% 59.6% 57.0% 59.1% 47.0% 2021 12/12 2.0 1.5 57.1% 64.4% 50.9% 42.3% 67.7% 58.8% 44.0%
29 2021 8/9 1.5 4.8 64.5% 58.8% 40.4% 44.2% 43.1% 51.9% 37.9% 2022 19/19 1.8 2.7 58.8% 62.4% 50.4% 58.2% 48.6% 57.7% 44.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 9/9 1.8 2.6 61.6% 55.9% 46.5% 47.2% 47.4% 52.4% 40.9%
Career — 361/388 4.0 4.3 58.6% 67.8% 45.8% 54.1% 49.0% 58.5% 44.6% — 187/207 1.9 2.4 60.8% 61.4% 48.7% 49.8% 46.4% 56.3% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kiki Bertens Aleksandra Krunic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1504 105.6 +1.42 +0.02 2.172 63.5% — — — 33.3% +0.33 — — — +0.40
19 2011 1494 97.6 +1.77 -1.03 0.783 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.13 2012 1526 101.6 -1.43 +0.94 1.036 51.0% +12 — — 62.5% +1.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.27
20 2012 1580 118.0 +0.05 -1.16 0.955 49.1% -24 +11 +4 47.1% -0.27 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 107.6 -0.87 2013 1463 96.7 -1.74 -1.39 0.941 48.2% +24 — — 27.3% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.48
21 2013 1551 121.8 -1.34 -0.74 0.952 48.8% +33 +22 — 44.6% -0.39 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.04 2014 1524 119.6 -0.18 -0.41 0.902 48.4% +2 — — 46.2% -0.46 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.31
22 2014 1580 124.4 -1.78 +0.96 0.993 49.7% -23 +77 — 47.2% -0.02 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 -0.24 2015 1543 109.3 -2.03 -3.19 0.832 46.3% -35 -23 +122 40.0% -0.91 4–4 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 104.3 +0.06
23 2015 1520 114.8 -1.77 -2.92 0.837 46.5% -52 +93 +82 34.5% -1.07 2–7 (22%) 3–2 (60%) 95.7 -1.23 2016 1595 118.6 -1.15 -1.51 0.893 47.6% -54 +15 +43 27.3% -1.30 0–1 1–1 — -1.00
24 2016 1689 132.6 +2.91 +1.95 1.122 52.4% -129 +137 -72 54.6% +0.61 6–5 (55%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.68 2017 1753 130.9 +2.13 +3.51 1.197 53.9% -68 +21 — 59.2% +0.68 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.88
25 2017 1696 135.9 +2.41 +1.24 1.122 52.6% -173 +308 -130 54.9% +0.68 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 90.8 +1.57 2018 1714 131.0 -0.44 -0.20 0.992 49.5% -69 +26 +49 44.3% -0.43 8–5 (62%) 5–3 (63%) 105.6 -0.57
26 2018 1911 154.4 +3.14 +4.20 1.171 53.3% -97 +80 -217 63.3% +1.14 14–12 (54%) 10–15 (40%) 100.3 -1.83 2019 1557 107.2 -2.43 -3.32 0.836 46.4% -17 +146 — 27.5% -1.58 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.16
27 2019 1897 153.7 +4.80 +1.58 1.142 52.4% -14 +155 -90 65.1% +0.95 18–13 (58%) 12–12 (50%) 102.5 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 1883 144.7 +1.90 +2.64 1.150 53.1% +54 +91 — 65.1% +1.09 5–2 (71%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +1.01 2021 1644 126.9 +1.13 +0.71 1.067 51.3% -4 +67 — 43.5% +0.17 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.04
29 2021 1733 102.2 -2.11 -1.63 0.787 44.9% +114 +208 — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.66 2022 1635 120.3 +0.48 +1.43 1.042 50.8% -31 +63 +22 48.8% -0.05 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.11
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1633 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1604 109.4 -1.80 -1.53 0.858 46.5% -21 — +83 30.4% -1.48 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.5 -0.04
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1566 106.9 — — — — — +73 — 25.0% -2.50 0–2 — — -0.70
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1551 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2004 143.8 +2.04 +1.38 1.074 51.4% -53 +144 -88 55.1% +0.46 62–63 (50%) 46–50 (48%) 100.2 -0.84 — 1772 124.4 -0.34 -0.21 0.983 49.6% -39 +40 +64 42.5% -0.51 23–30 (43%) 18–19 (49%) 97.4 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.