H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kiki Bertens vs Anne Keothavong H2H: 0-1
Anne Keothavong holds a 1–0 lead over Kiki Bertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Keothavong leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Keothavong won the 2012 Luxembourg third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2012* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anne Keothavong | 6-2 6-2 | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,015 | 214 | 168 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| Anne Keothavong | #287 | #48 | 1,315 | 1,633 | 48 | 89 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kiki Bertens | Anne Keothavong | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #180 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #236 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #60 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #100 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #121 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #143 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |