H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kiki Bertens vs Carina Witthoeft H2H: 1-1
Kiki Bertens and Carina Witthoeft are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kiki Bertens leads 1–0 on clay, while Carina Witthoeft leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carina Witthoeft won the 2017 Luxembourg quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2017* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Carina Witthoeft | 6-1 6-2 | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2017* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kiki Bertens | 6-1 6-4 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,015 | 214 | 168 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| Carina Witthoeft | #1,212 | #48 | 1,093 | 1,745 | 49 | 69 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kiki Bertens | Carina Witthoeft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #64 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |