H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kiki Bertens vs Irina Falconi Hartman H2H: 1-0
Kiki Bertens holds a 1–0 lead over Irina Falconi Hartman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kiki Bertens leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2016 Nurnberg quarterfinal 6-1 0-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2016* | Nurnberg | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Kiki Bertens | 6-1 0-1 (ret.) | Irina Falconi Hartman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,015 | 214 | 168 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| Irina Falconi Hartman | #1,008 | #63 | 1,005 | 1,614 | 42 | 72 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kiki Bertens | Irina Falconi Hartman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #151 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #99 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |