H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kiki Bertens vs Kateryna Volodko H2H: 1-0

Kiki Bertens holds a 1–0 lead over Kateryna Volodko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kiki Bertens leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2017 Charleston Open second round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kiki Bertens
NED Age 34 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kateryna Volodko
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kiki Bertens #21 6-2 7-5 Kateryna Volodko #92 Match data Apr 6, 2017* R32 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kiki Bertens #25 #4 5,430 2,004 216 172 55.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11
Kateryna Volodko #584 #29 1,740 1,802 138 190 42.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kiki Bertens Kateryna Volodko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #384 1,493 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #316 1,470 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2005 7–7 50.0% #121 1,535 0 0
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #182 1,493 0 0 2006 5–10 33.3% #100 1,530 0 0
20 2012 11–12 47.8% #63 1,580 0 1 2007 13–19 40.6% #44 1,622 0 0
21 2013 14–19 42.4% #87 1,551 0 1 2008 15–19 44.1% #62 1,640 0 1
22 2014 11–14 44.0% #68 1,579 0 1 2009 23–20 53.5% #31 1,770 0 1
23 2015 7–17 29.2% #104 1,520 0 1 2010 8–15 34.8% #99 1,666 0 1
24 2016 26–20 56.5% #22 1,689 0 2 2011 14–10 58.3% #85 1,720 0 1
25 2017 30–26 53.6% #31 1,696 0 5 2012 7–12 36.8% #136 1,656 0 1
26 2018 46–23 66.7% #9 1,911 0 8 — — — — — — —
27 2019 57–26 68.7% #9 1,897 0 10 2014 0–2 0.0% #201 1,616 0 1
28 2020 13–6 68.4% #9 1,882 0 11 2015 8–14 36.4% #89 1,605 0 1
29 2021 1–8 11.1% #25 1,733 0 11 2016 14–17 45.2% #69 1,673 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2017 13–14 48.1% #92 1,652 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2018 4–12 25.0% #132 1,587 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2019 0–2 0.0% #1168 1,554 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2020 5–8 38.5% #285 1,519 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2021 1–2 33.3% #207 1,534 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2023 0–2 0.0% #276 1,553 0 2
37 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% #584 1,543 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kiki Bertens Kateryna Volodko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 8 11 19 42.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2013 5 8 13 38.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2008 4 12 16 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2014 5 10 15 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 12 12 24 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2015 3 12 15 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 7 12 19 36.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2016 7 14 21 33.3% 17 5 22 77.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2011 7 6 13 53.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2017 7 16 23 30.4% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2018 26 15 41 63.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 30 18 48 62.5% 18 5 23 78.3% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 10 3 13 76.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2021 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 8 11 19 42.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 9 9 18 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 98 107 205 47.8% 95 45 140 67.9% 20 19 39 51.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — 84 117 201 41.8% 35 53 88 39.8% 17 19 36 47.2% 2 1 3 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 361/388 of Kiki Bertens's and 282/323 of Kateryna Volodko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kiki Bertens Kateryna Volodko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 4/14 4.3 4.8 51.4% 66.4% 43.7% 52.6% 32.1% 55.4% 39.6%
19 2011 1/1 3.0 5.0 53.7% 61.1% 32.3% 50.0% 42.9% 47.8% 40.9% 2006 8/15 3.0 6.1 54.5% 61.2% 47.5% 44.5% 48.0% 54.8% 42.2%
20 2012 23/23 2.9 4.1 60.5% 65.3% 41.1% 49.3% 48.2% 55.7% 42.3% 2007 27/32 2.7 4.6 57.4% 63.9% 44.4% 57.8% 50.6% 55.6% 43.3%
21 2013 30/33 2.2 5.5 57.6% 61.8% 42.9% 51.9% 45.5% 54.1% 43.7% 2008 33/34 2.4 3.7 57.4% 64.2% 46.1% 49.9% 47.7% 56.6% 40.0%
22 2014 22/25 2.7 4.0 58.1% 60.8% 44.5% 49.6% 41.8% 53.8% 45.8% 2009 41/43 2.0 3.5 63.5% 62.3% 44.6% 49.5% 49.1% 55.7% 43.8%
23 2015 19/24 1.9 5.1 63.9% 59.1% 51.6% 53.8% 57.3% 56.1% 36.8% 2010 21/23 2.7 4.4 60.6% 59.9% 41.6% 45.5% 43.5% 52.7% 43.1%
24 2016 45/46 3.8 3.4 60.1% 67.4% 47.6% 55.6% 44.9% 59.0% 46.0% 2011 23/24 1.5 3.8 64.8% 62.4% 43.3% 53.4% 60.9% 56.0% 46.7%
25 2017 54/56 4.5 4.4 55.5% 71.4% 43.7% 54.1% 50.0% 59.1% 45.9% 2012 17/19 1.7 6.8 64.1% 61.2% 35.3% 50.6% 44.1% 51.9% 42.7%
26 2018 64/69 4.8 4.0 58.0% 69.1% 47.9% 51.8% 51.7% 60.0% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 76/83 5.6 4.4 57.1% 72.6% 47.2% 58.5% 48.8% 61.8% 43.6% 2014 2/2 0.5 6.0 63.1% 68.8% 28.9% 54.5% 49.2% 53.9% 42.4%
28 2020 19/19 4.2 3.8 63.7% 68.3% 43.5% 59.6% 57.0% 59.1% 47.0% 2015 14/22 1.5 5.3 69.1% 62.2% 47.4% 59.2% 56.9% 57.6% 39.7%
29 2021 8/9 1.5 4.8 64.5% 58.8% 40.4% 44.2% 43.1% 51.9% 37.9% 2016 31/31 2.5 4.5 64.8% 62.1% 43.6% 51.6% 52.0% 55.3% 44.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 26/27 2.5 5.1 62.8% 62.7% 43.7% 47.0% 57.8% 55.6% 45.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 14/16 2.1 5.7 60.0% 60.4% 41.8% 50.4% 40.5% 53.0% 39.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 2/2 2.5 7.5 48.6% 58.1% 32.0% 37.5% 34.1% 44.6% 41.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 13/13 2.1 6.0 59.6% 64.5% 40.3% 55.8% 53.2% 54.5% 41.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 3/3 2.0 3.3 58.4% 51.7% 41.3% 47.5% 33.2% 47.4% 37.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 2/2 0.0 5.0 61.7% 54.7% 35.4% 54.2% 69.0% 47.4% 38.7%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 1/1 1.0 5.0 60.3% 70.5% 65.5% 60.0% 25.0% 68.5% 31.8%
Career — 361/388 4.0 4.3 58.6% 67.8% 45.8% 54.1% 49.0% 58.5% 44.6% — 282/328 2.2 4.6 61.5% 62.4% 43.3% 51.1% 50.1% 55.0% 42.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kiki Bertens Kateryna Volodko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1493 99.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 — 0–1 — +0.13
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1470 92.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — 0–1 — -0.06
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1535 114.5 -0.65 -1.39 0.888 47.3% +53 -74 — 48.4% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.2 +0.22
19 2011 1494 97.6 +1.77 -1.03 0.783 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.13 2006 1530 109.9 -0.47 -1.41 0.933 48.7% +34 -81 — 39.4% -0.76 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.19
20 2012 1580 118.0 +0.05 -1.16 0.955 49.1% -24 +11 +4 47.1% -0.27 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 107.6 -0.87 2007 1623 134.3 -0.20 +0.29 0.974 49.7% -9 -92 — 40.5% -0.53 6–6 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 102.9 -1.23
21 2013 1551 121.8 -1.34 -0.74 0.952 48.8% +33 +22 — 44.6% -0.39 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.04 2008 1641 129.4 +1.11 -2.53 0.922 48.7% -55 -111 +64 44.9% -0.41 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.4 -0.94
22 2014 1580 124.4 -1.78 +0.96 0.993 49.7% -23 +77 — 47.2% -0.02 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 -0.24 2009 1771 139.2 +0.57 +0.61 0.989 49.9% -80 -106 -46 53.5% +0.09 8–7 (53%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -0.90
23 2015 1520 114.8 -1.77 -2.92 0.837 46.5% -52 +93 +82 34.5% -1.07 2–7 (22%) 3–2 (60%) 95.7 -1.23 2010 1667 123.1 -2.00 -0.23 0.911 47.7% -7 -36 — 37.5% -0.85 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 -0.17
24 2016 1689 132.6 +2.91 +1.95 1.122 52.4% -129 +137 -72 54.6% +0.61 6–5 (55%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.68 2011 1721 131.2 +0.20 +2.11 1.061 51.5% -32 -47 -19 62.0% +0.92 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -1.37
25 2017 1696 135.9 +2.41 +1.24 1.122 52.6% -173 +308 -130 54.9% +0.68 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 90.8 +1.57 2012 1656 118.5 -1.96 -0.33 0.888 47.3% +28 -33 +55 36.4% -0.91 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 101.9 -1.12
26 2018 1911 154.4 +3.14 +4.20 1.171 53.3% -97 +80 -217 63.3% +1.14 14–12 (54%) 10–15 (40%) 100.3 -1.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 1897 153.7 +4.80 +1.58 1.142 52.4% -14 +155 -90 65.1% +0.95 18–13 (58%) 12–12 (50%) 102.5 +0.54 2014 1617 101.3 -2.50 -3.04 0.919 47.8% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 — — +0.07
28 2020 1883 144.7 +1.90 +2.64 1.150 53.1% +54 +91 — 65.1% +1.09 5–2 (71%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +1.01 2015 1605 129.5 -0.14 -0.79 0.935 49.1% +30 -35 — 40.8% -0.22 3–4 (43%) 1–7 (13%) 94.1 -1.36
29 2021 1733 102.2 -2.11 -1.63 0.787 44.9% +114 +208 — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.66 2016 1673 127.0 -0.24 +0.59 0.993 49.8% +20 -110 +22 44.9% -0.05 9–7 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 98.5 -1.35
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1653 121.1 -0.88 +1.50 1.012 50.3% +65 -155 — 48.3% -0.15 3–7 (30%) 2–4 (33%) 95.5 +1.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1587 117.1 -1.92 -1.90 0.835 46.5% +93 -154 +97 34.2% -0.89 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 100.9 -0.30
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1555 96.1 -2.89 -0.91 0.739 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — +0.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1520 114.3 -2.12 -1.71 0.910 48.5% +80 — — 38.7% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.76
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1535 102.9 -0.85 -0.91 0.710 42.6% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 — — +0.05
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1550 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1553 107.2 -1.05 +0.97 0.736 44.2% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.28
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1543 102.6 -0.34 -0.32 1.010 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.29
Career — 2004 143.8 +2.04 +1.38 1.074 51.4% -53 +144 -88 55.1% +0.46 62–63 (50%) 46–50 (48%) 100.2 -0.84 — 1802 130.3 -0.44 -0.15 0.950 49.0% +5 -92 +35 44.0% -0.33 52–60 (46%) 33–52 (39%) 94.5 -1.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.