H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kiki Bertens vs Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez H2H: 1-0
Kiki Bertens holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kiki Bertens leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2013 Acapulco fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2013* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Kiki Bertens | 6-1 6-2 | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,015 | 214 | 168 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | #761 | #19 | 2,635 | 1,891 | 105 | 99 | 51.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kiki Bertens | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #93 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #35 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2021 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #162 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #555 | 1,678 | 0 | 5 |