H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kiki Bertens vs Mona Barthel H2H: 3-6

Mona Barthel holds a 6–3 lead over Kiki Bertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Mona Barthel leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2018 Nurnberg round of 16 6-7(2) 6-2 6-4.

NED Age 34 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 6
9 main-draw meetings
Germany Age 36 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kiki Bertens #18 6-7(2) 6-2 6-4 Mona Barthel #122 Match data May 25, 2018* R16 Nurnberg International modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Kiki Bertens #28 6-4 6-4 Mona Barthel #68 Match data Jun 30, 2016* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Mona Barthel #49 7-5 3-6 6-2 Kiki Bertens #97 Match data Oct 15, 2015* R32 Linz Open International modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Mona Barthel #52 6-7(4) 6-2 6-3 Kiki Bertens #117 Match data Jul 16, 2015* R32 Bastad International modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Mona Barthel #46 6-3 6-0 Kiki Bertens #73 Match data Oct 18, 2014* QF Luxembourg International modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Mona Barthel #47 6-3 6-1 Kiki Bertens #74 Match data Oct 9, 2014* R32 Linz Open International modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Mona Barthel #28 6-1 6-4 Kiki Bertens #44 Match data Mar 9, 2013* R64 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Kiki Bertens #60 7-6(3) 1-6 6-1 Mona Barthel #37 Match data Oct 11, 2012* R32 Linz Open International modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Mona Barthel #41 6-3 6-2 Kiki Bertens #72 Match data Jul 19, 2012* R32 Bastad International modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kiki Bertens #25 #4 5,430 2,004 216 172 55.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11
Mona Barthel #205 #23 1,762 1,840 151 182 45.3% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kiki Bertens Mona Barthel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #182 1,493 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #195 1,493 0 0
20 2012 11–12 47.8% #63 1,580 0 1 2011 5–6 45.5% #69 1,552 0 0
21 2013 14–19 42.4% #87 1,551 0 1 2012 29–24 54.7% #39 1,682 0 1
22 2014 11–14 44.0% #68 1,579 0 1 2013 24–22 52.2% #34 1,646 0 2
23 2015 7–17 29.2% #104 1,520 0 1 2014 23–23 50.0% #42 1,713 0 3
24 2016 26–20 56.5% #22 1,689 0 2 2015 24–26 48.0% #45 1,670 0 3
25 2017 30–26 53.6% #31 1,696 0 5 2016 6–13 31.6% #158 1,560 0 3
26 2018 46–23 66.7% #9 1,911 0 8 2017 17–18 48.6% #48 1,602 0 4
27 2019 57–26 68.7% #9 1,897 0 10 2018 14–20 41.2% #77 1,625 0 4
28 2020 13–6 68.4% #9 1,882 0 11 2019 6–13 31.6% #183 1,549 0 4
29 2021 1–8 11.1% #25 1,733 0 11
30 2021 3–12 20.0% #275 1,457 0 4
33 2024 0–2 0.0% #171 1,525 0 4
35 2026 0–2 0.0% #205 1,556 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kiki Bertens Mona Barthel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2013 5 8 13 38.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2012 21 14 35 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2014 5 10 15 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 2013 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 2015 3 12 15 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2014 11 14 25 44.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2016 7 14 21 33.3% 17 5 22 77.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2015 18 16 34 52.9% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2017 7 16 23 30.4% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2016 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2018 26 15 41 63.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2017 6 9 15 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 2019 30 18 48 62.5% 18 5 23 78.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 2018 8 12 20 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2020 10 3 13 76.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2019 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2021 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2021 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 2024 0 2 2 0.0%
35 2026 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 98 107 205 47.8% 95 45 140 67.9% 20 19 39 51.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 96 104 200 48.0% 38 51 89 42.7% 10 25 35 28.6% 7 2 9 77.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 361/388 of Kiki Bertens's and 309/334 of Mona Barthel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kiki Bertens Mona Barthel
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2011 1/1 3.0 5.0 53.7% 61.1% 32.3% 50.0% 42.9% 47.8% 40.9% 2010 1/1 6.0 2.0 64.3% 66.7% 52.0% 60.0% 0.0% 61.4% 31.3%
20 2012 23/23 2.9 4.1 60.5% 65.3% 41.1% 49.3% 48.2% 55.7% 42.3% 2011 11/11 2.1 4.2 61.8% 63.6% 38.0% 50.5% 45.8% 53.6% 43.1%
21 2013 30/33 2.2 5.5 57.6% 61.8% 42.9% 51.9% 45.5% 54.1% 43.7% 2012 50/53 4.2 5.7 53.8% 70.4% 46.7% 53.9% 50.1% 59.2% 46.4%
22 2014 22/25 2.7 4.0 58.1% 60.8% 44.5% 49.6% 41.8% 53.8% 45.8% 2013 46/46 3.3 3.4 61.5% 66.4% 45.6% 56.9% 46.0% 58.5% 43.7%
23 2015 19/24 1.9 5.1 63.9% 59.1% 51.6% 53.8% 57.3% 56.1% 36.8% 2014 43/46 2.5 4.0 61.4% 64.9% 45.0% 55.3% 46.4% 57.1% 43.0%
24 2016 45/46 3.8 3.4 60.1% 67.4% 47.6% 55.6% 44.9% 59.0% 46.0% 2015 35/50 3.5 3.7 59.3% 64.0% 49.5% 47.1% 42.6% 58.1% 41.4%
25 2017 54/56 4.5 4.4 55.5% 71.4% 43.7% 54.1% 50.0% 59.1% 45.9% 2016 18/20 3.8 5.6 55.2% 66.7% 43.9% 50.0% 46.3% 56.8% 39.4%
26 2018 64/69 4.8 4.0 58.0% 69.1% 47.9% 51.8% 51.7% 60.0% 46.8% 2017 34/35 4.1 5.1 61.2% 65.8% 43.6% 53.5% 46.5% 56.9% 42.2%
27 2019 76/83 5.6 4.4 57.1% 72.6% 47.2% 58.5% 48.8% 61.8% 43.6% 2018 34/34 5.0 6.3 57.7% 66.0% 43.3% 56.9% 45.8% 56.3% 39.8%
28 2020 19/19 4.2 3.8 63.7% 68.3% 43.5% 59.6% 57.0% 59.1% 47.0% 2019 19/19 4.1 6.3 57.6% 67.5% 41.5% 48.3% 42.4% 56.3% 38.3%
29 2021 8/9 1.5 4.8 64.5% 58.8% 40.4% 44.2% 43.1% 51.9% 37.9% —/—
30 —/— 2021 14/15 5.4 6.3 53.6% 68.6% 42.3% 49.5% 37.8% 56.5% 37.1%
33 —/— 2024 2/2 2.5 10.0 51.7% 54.0% 44.0% 14.3% 32.5% 49.3% 42.7%
35 —/— 2026 2/2 1.0 7.5 59.7% 62.5% 38.1% 53.3% 30.6% 52.6% 43.5%
Career 361/388 4.0 4.3 58.6% 67.8% 45.8% 54.1% 49.0% 58.5% 44.6% 309/334 3.8 4.9 58.5% 66.4% 44.9% 52.9% 45.4% 57.4% 42.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kiki Bertens Mona Barthel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2011 1494 97.6 +1.77 -1.03 0.783 44.4% 0.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.13 2010 1493 100.8 +1.29 +0.85 0.810 47.0% 0.0% -2.00 -0.14
20 2012 1580 118.0 +0.05 -1.16 0.955 49.1% -24 +11 +4 47.1% -0.27 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 107.6 -0.87 2011 1552 119.1 -0.55 -0.55 0.929 48.7% +28 -19 45.8% -0.46 1–1 1–3 (25%) -0.58
21 2013 1551 121.8 -1.34 -0.74 0.952 48.8% +33 +22 44.6% -0.39 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.04 2012 1682 144.4 +3.00 +2.35 1.139 52.8% +34 -50 -166 57.8% +0.69 3–11 (21%) 10–12 (45%) 92.9 -2.53
22 2014 1580 124.4 -1.78 +0.96 0.993 49.7% -23 +77 47.2% -0.02 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 -0.24 2013 1646 138.9 +2.09 +0.25 1.053 51.1% +80 -90 -184 53.4% +0.41 6–7 (46%) 6–7 (46%) 97.5 -0.66
23 2015 1520 114.8 -1.77 -2.92 0.837 46.5% -52 +93 +82 34.5% -1.07 2–7 (22%) 3–2 (60%) 95.7 -1.23 2014 1713 124.3 +1.01 -0.81 1.002 50.2% -62 -24 -158 50.5% -0.09 5–6 (45%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -0.80
24 2016 1689 132.6 +2.91 +1.95 1.122 52.4% -129 +137 -72 54.6% +0.61 6–5 (55%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.68 2015 1671 128.2 -0.49 -0.40 0.986 49.6% +10 -45 51.7% +0.24 10–14 (42%) 10–10 (50%) 96.5 +2.15
25 2017 1696 135.9 +2.41 +1.24 1.122 52.6% -173 +308 -130 54.9% +0.68 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 90.8 +1.57 2016 1561 109.3 +0.53 -2.53 0.913 48.2% +29 +35 -55 37.8% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.5 -0.82
26 2018 1911 154.4 +3.14 +4.20 1.171 53.3% -97 +80 -217 63.3% +1.14 14–12 (54%) 10–15 (40%) 100.3 -1.83 2017 1602 121.9 +0.49 -0.40 0.977 49.6% -11 +63 -97 48.8% -0.34 6–8 (43%) 6–2 (75%) 100.9 -0.52
27 2019 1897 153.7 +4.80 +1.58 1.142 52.4% -14 +155 -90 65.1% +0.95 18–13 (58%) 12–12 (50%) 102.5 +0.54 2018 1625 120.7 -0.13 -2.87 0.910 48.2% +7 -36 -60 42.2% -0.52 8–7 (53%) 3–4 (43%) 102.3 -0.60
28 2020 1883 144.7 +1.90 +2.64 1.150 53.1% +54 +91 65.1% +1.09 5–2 (71%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +1.01 2019 1550 122.1 -0.64 -2.56 0.876 47.5% +130 -29 32.6% -1.02 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 103.3 -0.70
29 2021 1733 102.2 -2.11 -1.63 0.787 44.9% +114 +208 20.0% -2.00 0–2 +0.66 2020 1535
30 2021 1457 106.9 -0.29 -3.24 0.854 46.7% +105 26.5% -1.44 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.65
32 2023 1420 94.8
33 2024 1525 110.3 -2.16 -0.17 0.843 45.9% 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–1 +0.02
34 2025 1576
35 2026 1556 106.9 +0.24 -2.27 0.918 47.9% 0.0% -2.00 0–2 -0.20
Career 2004 143.8 +2.04 +1.38 1.074 51.4% -53 +144 -88 55.1% +0.46 62–63 (50%) 46–50 (48%) 100.2 -0.84 1841 131.0 +0.87 -0.58 0.990 49.8% +28 -20 -126 47.5% -0.11 46–65 (41%) 47–51 (48%) 95.2 -1.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.