H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Kiki Bertens vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 2-0

Kiki Bertens holds a 2–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kiki Bertens leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2016 Gstaad first round 5-7 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kiki Bertens
NED Age 34 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kiki Bertens #26 5-7 6-2 6-4 Tamira Paszek Match data Jul 14, 2016* R32 Gstaad International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Kiki Bertens #65 6-4 7-5 Tamira Paszek Match data Jan 31, 2013* R32 Paris Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kiki Bertens #25 #4 5,430 2,004 216 172 55.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kiki Bertens Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #182 1,493 0 0 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 2012 11–12 47.8% #63 1,580 0 1 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2013 14–19 42.4% #87 1,551 0 1 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 2014 11–14 44.0% #68 1,579 0 1 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 2015 7–17 29.2% #104 1,520 0 1 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 2016 26–20 56.5% #22 1,689 0 2 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2017 30–26 53.6% #31 1,696 0 5 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2018 46–23 66.7% #9 1,911 0 8 — — — — — — —
27 2019 57–26 68.7% #9 1,897 0 10 — — — — — — —
28 2020 13–6 68.4% #9 1,882 0 11 — — — — — — —
29 2021 1–8 11.1% #25 1,733 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kiki Bertens Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2013 5 8 13 38.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 2014 5 10 15 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2015 3 12 15 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2016 7 14 21 33.3% 17 5 22 77.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2017 7 16 23 30.4% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2018 26 15 41 63.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 30 18 48 62.5% 18 5 23 78.3% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 10 3 13 76.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 98 107 205 47.8% 95 45 140 67.9% 20 19 39 51.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 361/388 of Kiki Bertens's and 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kiki Bertens Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 2011 1/1 3.0 5.0 53.7% 61.1% 32.3% 50.0% 42.9% 47.8% 40.9% 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 2012 23/23 2.9 4.1 60.5% 65.3% 41.1% 49.3% 48.2% 55.7% 42.3% 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 2013 30/33 2.2 5.5 57.6% 61.8% 42.9% 51.9% 45.5% 54.1% 43.7% 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2014 22/25 2.7 4.0 58.1% 60.8% 44.5% 49.6% 41.8% 53.8% 45.8% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 2015 19/24 1.9 5.1 63.9% 59.1% 51.6% 53.8% 57.3% 56.1% 36.8% 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2016 45/46 3.8 3.4 60.1% 67.4% 47.6% 55.6% 44.9% 59.0% 46.0% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2017 54/56 4.5 4.4 55.5% 71.4% 43.7% 54.1% 50.0% 59.1% 45.9% 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2018 64/69 4.8 4.0 58.0% 69.1% 47.9% 51.8% 51.7% 60.0% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 76/83 5.6 4.4 57.1% 72.6% 47.2% 58.5% 48.8% 61.8% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 19/19 4.2 3.8 63.7% 68.3% 43.5% 59.6% 57.0% 59.1% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 8/9 1.5 4.8 64.5% 58.8% 40.4% 44.2% 43.1% 51.9% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 361/388 4.0 4.3 58.6% 67.8% 45.8% 54.1% 49.0% 58.5% 44.6% — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kiki Bertens Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05
19 2011 1494 97.6 +1.77 -1.03 0.783 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.13 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 2012 1580 118.0 +0.05 -1.16 0.955 49.1% -24 +11 +4 47.1% -0.27 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 107.6 -0.87 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2013 1551 121.8 -1.34 -0.74 0.952 48.8% +33 +22 — 44.6% -0.39 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.04 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 2014 1580 124.4 -1.78 +0.96 0.993 49.7% -23 +77 — 47.2% -0.02 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 -0.24 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 2015 1520 114.8 -1.77 -2.92 0.837 46.5% -52 +93 +82 34.5% -1.07 2–7 (22%) 3–2 (60%) 95.7 -1.23 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 2016 1689 132.6 +2.91 +1.95 1.122 52.4% -129 +137 -72 54.6% +0.61 6–5 (55%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.68 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2017 1696 135.9 +2.41 +1.24 1.122 52.6% -173 +308 -130 54.9% +0.68 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 90.8 +1.57 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2018 1911 154.4 +3.14 +4.20 1.171 53.3% -97 +80 -217 63.3% +1.14 14–12 (54%) 10–15 (40%) 100.3 -1.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 1897 153.7 +4.80 +1.58 1.142 52.4% -14 +155 -90 65.1% +0.95 18–13 (58%) 12–12 (50%) 102.5 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 1883 144.7 +1.90 +2.64 1.150 53.1% +54 +91 — 65.1% +1.09 5–2 (71%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 1733 102.2 -2.11 -1.63 0.787 44.9% +114 +208 — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2004 143.8 +2.04 +1.38 1.074 51.4% -53 +144 -88 55.1% +0.46 62–63 (50%) 46–50 (48%) 100.2 -0.84 — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.