H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Kiki Bertens vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 2-0
Kiki Bertens holds a 2–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kiki Bertens leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2016 Gstaad third round 5-7 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiki Bertens | 5-7 6-2 6-4 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Jul 14, 2016* | Gstaad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay |
| Kiki Bertens | 6-4 7-5 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Jan 31, 2013* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,003 | 214 | 170 | 55.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kiki Bertens | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2016 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,895 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,882 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #25 | 1,733 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |