H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Kim Jones vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 0-1

Andrea Temesvari holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Temesvari won the 1983 Brighton round of 16 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Jones
USA Age 69
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Andrea Temesvari
HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Temesvari 6-3 6-1 Kim Jones Match data Oct 21, 1983* R16 Brighton WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Jones — — — 1,801 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Andrea Temesvari — #7 109 2,022 185 179 50.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Jones Andrea Temesvari
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,624 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,771 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,990 0 4
18 — — — — — — — 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,889 0 4
19 — — — — — — — 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,849 0 5
20 1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,802 0 5
21 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% — 1,776 0 5
22 1980 1–10 9.1% — 1,423 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,459 0 0 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,750 0 5
24 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,483 0 0 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,612 0 5
25 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,758 0 1 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5
26 1984 13–24 35.1% — 1,667 0 1 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,607 0 5
27 1985 13–18 41.9% — 1,725 0 1 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,475 0 5
28 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,677 0 1 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,476 0 5
29 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,629 0 1 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,485 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1996 4–6 40.0% #181 1,532 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,529 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Jones Andrea Temesvari
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1985 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 1986 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4% — 44 57 101 43.6% 89 62 151 58.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 43 69 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Jones Andrea Temesvari
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1624 130.8 — — — — — — — 60.5% +0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — -0.16
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1772 146.5 — — — — -152 -31 -162 59.2% +0.69 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -3.02
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1990 163.1 — — — — -215 +103 -366 75.4% +2.16 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +1.39
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1890 136.6 — — — — -79 +109 -174 61.2% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 105.4 +3.45
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1849 136.5 — — — — -48 +129 — 61.5% +0.86 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 95.7 +1.41
20 1978 1506 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.08 1986 1802 139.5 — — — — -39 +157 — 55.1% +0.29 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 94.1 -0.74
21 1979 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09 1987 1776 105.3 — — — — -39 — — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 — — -0.17
22 1980 1423 94.6 — — — — +38 — — 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1981 1459 107.5 — — — — +44 +75 — 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +1.57 1989 1751 135.3 — — — — -31 +153 — 50.0% -0.01 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.1 -0.31
24 1982 1484 104.0 — — — — -68 -7 +112 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.61 1990 1612 121.4 — — — — +9 +190 — 34.5% -1.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +0.21
25 1983 1758 132.1 — — — — -40 — -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.44 1991 1542 110.6 — — — — +7 +224 +66 36.4% -1.34 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.0 +0.26
26 1984 1668 132.8 — — — — +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.14 1992 1608 122.1 — — — — -5 +81 +64 41.5% -0.70 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 +0.26
27 1985 1725 135.7 — — — — -9 — -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.50 1993 1476 111.1 — — — — +32 +134 — 28.8% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 +0.66
28 1986 1678 104.5 — — — — -13 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.69 1994 1477 113.1 — — — — +1 +154 — 27.8% -1.83 1–1 — — -0.25
29 1987 1630 104.2 — — — — -23 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.20 1995 1486 104.7 — — — — -22 +124 — 43.8% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.71
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1532 128.1 — — — — — +113 — 45.5% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1529 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.29
Career — 1801 126.5 — — — — -6 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.77 — 2022 143.4 — — — — -57 +117 -111 52.6% +0.18 42–48 (47%) 33–38 (46%) 97.5 +1.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.