H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Kim Jones vs Ann Henricksson H2H: 1-0

Kim Jones holds a 1–0 lead over Ann Henricksson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Jones leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kim Jones won the 1985 Oakland round of 32 7-5 6-4.

USA Age 68
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Jones 7-5 6-4 Ann Henricksson #36 Match data Feb 21, 1985* R32 Oakland WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Jones 1,800 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ann Henricksson #892 #36 21 1,755 147 210 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Jones Ann Henricksson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1978 1–1 50.0% 1,506 0 0 1980 3–5 37.5% 1,498 0 0
21 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0 1981 1–4 20.0% 1,478 0 0
22 1980 1–10 9.1% 1,422 0 0 1982 5–6 45.5% 1,522 0 0
23 1981 6–13 31.6% 1,458 0 0 1983 9–19 32.1% 1,540 0 0
24 1982 4–14 22.2% 1,483 0 0 1984 13–16 44.8% #40 1,658 0 0
25 1983 20–14 58.8% 1,757 0 1 1985 18–22 45.0% #36 1,697 0 0
26 1984 13–24 35.1% 1,667 0 1 1986 20–21 48.8% #49 1,691 0 0
27 1985 13–18 41.9% 1,724 0 1 1987 17–23 42.5% #60 1,652 0 0
28 1986 2–4 33.3% 1,677 0 1 1988 15–19 44.1% #71 1,647 0 0
29 1987 0–4 0.0% 1,629 0 1 1989 18–21 46.2% #53 1,676 0 0
30 1990 11–19 36.7% #114 1,628 0 0
31 1991 8–13 38.1% #142 1,596 0 0
32 1992 0–6 0.0% #272 1,525 0 0
33 1993 5–9 35.7% #141 1,542 0 0
34 1994 4–7 36.4% #215 1,530 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Jones Ann Henricksson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1983 3 7 10 30.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1984 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1985 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 7 10 30.0%
26 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 10 19 47.4%
27 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1987 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 7 10 30.0%
28 1986 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 3 11 14 21.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 11 13 24 45.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
30 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7%
31 1991 4 9 13 30.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1992 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1993 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
34 1994 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4% 54 94 148 36.5% 9 20 29 31.0% 57 49 106 53.8% 27 47 74 36.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Jones Ann Henricksson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1978 1506 102.4 50.0% -0.75 -0.08 1980 1499 103.6 +3 +85 41.2% -1.35 0–1 +0.35
21 1979 1490 +0.09 1981 1479 107.0 +41 27.3% -1.46 0–1 1–1 +0.34
22 1980 1423 94.6 +36 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.50 1982 1523 114.8 +33 0 38.1% -0.95 1–0 -0.02
23 1981 1459 107.5 +44 +75 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 +1.50 1983 1541 115.5 0 -4 +70 33.8% -0.85 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 101.4 +1.02
24 1982 1484 103.7 -68 -7 +110 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.59 1984 1659 129.1 -145 -134 +106 46.9% -0.42 2–4 (33%) 5–1 (83%) 102.6 +0.30
25 1983 1758 131.9 -40 -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.43 1985 1698 131.9 -127 +89 47.9% -0.26 6–10 (38%) 8–6 (57%) 101.0 +1.52
26 1984 1667 132.6 +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.22 1986 1692 127.5 -41 -178 +86 48.3% -0.36 7–4 (64%) 7–4 (64%) 106.1 +1.06
27 1985 1725 135.5 -10 -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.52 1987 1652 125.5 -15 -155 +68 41.5% -0.29 9–5 (64%) 2–9 (18%) 100.7 -0.53
28 1986 1677 104.5 -12 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.70 1988 1647 128.7 -58 +101 45.5% -0.05 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 99.8 +0.89
29 1987 1629 103.9 -23 11.1% -2.67 0–1 -0.24 1989 1676 133.3 -49 +86 45.6% -0.20 7–5 (58%) 3–7 (30%) 99.5 +0.99
30 1990 1628 118.2 -73 +176 37.1% -1.06 6–4 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 103.2 -1.10
31 1991 1597 121.1 -38 +179 39.6% -0.50 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 98.7 +0.17
32 1992 1525 101.7 -19 20.0% -2.33 0–3 (0%) -0.35
33 1993 1542 121.7 -1 45.5% -0.18 2–5 (29%) 0–2 -0.12
34 1994 1531 101.5 -10 30.4% -1.52 2–1 (67%) 0–1 +0.07
Career 1801 126.3 -7 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.88 1756 130.0 -50 -58 +100 42.3% -0.52 56–55 (50%) 36–50 (42%) 101.3 +1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.