H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kim Jones vs Annabel Croft H2H: 1-1
Kim Jones and Annabel Croft are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1987 Boca Raton second round 3-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 1987* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Annabel Croft | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Kim Jones | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kim Jones | 6-3 6-7 6-3 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Jones | — | — | — | 1,801 | 60 | 103 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Jones | Annabel Croft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1980 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1981 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1982 | 4–14 | 22.2% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1984 | 13–24 | 35.1% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1985 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |