H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Kim Jones vs Annabel Croft H2H: 1-1

Kim Jones and Annabel Croft are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1987 Boca Raton round of 64 3-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Jones
USA Age 68
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Annabel Croft
GBR Age 60

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Annabel Croft 3-6 6-4 6-4 Kim Jones Match data Feb 18, 1987* R64 Boca Raton WTA 250 Hard
Kim Jones 6-3 6-7 6-3 Annabel Croft Match data Sep 1, 1983* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Jones — — — 1,800 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Annabel Croft — — — 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Jones Annabel Croft
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1981 9–5 64.3% — 1,535 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1982 14–9 60.9% — 1,588 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,595 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1984 11–14 44.0% — 1,615 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1985 23–20 53.5% — 1,761 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 1986 10–19 34.5% — 1,653 0 1
20 1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0 1987 8–14 36.4% — 1,574 0 1
21 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1988 3–3 50.0% — 1,562 0 1
22 1980 1–10 9.1% — 1,422 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,757 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1984 13–24 35.1% — 1,667 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1985 13–18 41.9% — 1,724 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,677 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,629 0 1 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Jones Annabel Croft
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.31
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1535 118.4 — — — — — — +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.81
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1589 120.1 — — — — — +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +2.10
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1595 118.1 — — — — -29 — +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.87
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1615 118.2 — — — — -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1762 133.2 — — — — +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1653 120.6 — — — — +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89
20 1978 1506 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.08 1987 1575 108.2 — — — — +47 — -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97
21 1979 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09 1988 1562 97.6 — — — — +29 — — 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.72
22 1980 1423 94.6 — — — — +36 — — 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1981 1459 107.5 — — — — +44 +75 — 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1982 1484 103.7 — — — — -68 -7 +110 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1983 1758 131.9 — — — — -40 — -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1984 1667 132.6 — — — — +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1985 1725 135.5 — — — — -10 — -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1986 1677 104.5 — — — — -12 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 1629 103.9 — — — — -23 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1801 126.3 — — — — -7 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.88 — 1780 125.1 — — — — +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.