H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kim Jones vs Beverly Mould H2H: 1-0

Kim Jones holds a 1–0 lead over Beverly Mould in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Jones leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Jones won the 1985 Birmingham round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Jones
USA Age 68
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Beverly Mould
RSA Age 64 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Jones 6-2 6-3 Beverly Mould Match data Jun 13, 1985* R32 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Jones — — — 1,800 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Beverly Mould #46 #46 — 1,666 32 46 41.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Jones Beverly Mould
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1980 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1981 7–7 50.0% — 1,520 0 0
20 1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0 1982 6–6 50.0% — 1,574 0 0
21 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1983 5–6 45.5% — 1,599 0 0
22 1980 1–10 9.1% — 1,422 0 0 1984 10–14 41.7% #46 1,647 0 0
23 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,458 0 0 1985 3–12 20.0% — 1,536 0 0
24 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,757 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1984 13–24 35.1% — 1,667 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1985 13–18 41.9% — 1,724 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,677 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,629 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Jones Beverly Mould
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1985 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1985 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1986 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4% — 10 17 27 37.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 12 15 27 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Jones Beverly Mould
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1505 99.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.23
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1521 115.2 — — — — — — — 53.3% +0.83 0–2 0–6 (0%) — +1.08
20 1978 1506 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.08 1982 1575 120.3 — — — — — +20 +30 55.2% -0.04 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.29
21 1979 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09 1983 1600 117.3 — — — — +18 +52 — 47.8% -0.30 0–1 1–0 — +0.31
22 1980 1423 94.6 — — — — +36 — — 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.50 1984 1647 123.3 — — — — -41 — -1 41.8% -0.45 4–3 (57%) 4–2 (67%) 105.0 +0.37
23 1981 1459 107.5 — — — — +44 +75 — 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +1.50 1985 1537 101.2 — — — — -37 — +81 25.7% -1.51 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.7 +0.96
24 1982 1484 103.7 — — — — -68 -7 +110 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1983 1758 131.9 — — — — -40 — -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1984 1667 132.6 — — — — +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1985 1725 135.5 — — — — -10 — -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1986 1677 104.5 — — — — -12 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 1629 103.9 — — — — -23 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1801 126.3 — — — — -7 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.88 — 1667 120.3 — — — — -28 +34 +25 43.8% -0.35 7–13 (35%) 9–12 (43%) 94.1 +4.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.