H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kim Jones vs Catrin Jexell H2H: 0-1

Catrin Jexell holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catrin Jexell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catrin Jexell won the 1983 Ridgewood round of 16 6-3 7-6.

USA Age 68
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catrin Jexell 6-3 7-6 Kim Jones Match data Feb 25, 1983* R16 Ridgewood WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Jones 1,800 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Catrin Jexell 1,737 46 62 42.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Jones Catrin Jexell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1979 0–2 0.0% 1,474 0 0
17 1980 6–4 60.0% 1,545 0 0
18 1981 6–7 46.2% 1,544 0 0
19 1982 14–8 63.6% 1,661 0 1
20 1978 1–1 50.0% 1,506 0 0 1983 12–17 41.4% 1,648 0 1
21 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0 1984 5–15 25.0% 1,536 0 1
22 1980 1–10 9.1% 1,422 0 0 1985 3–8 27.3% 1,490 0 1
23 1981 6–13 31.6% 1,458 0 0
24 1982 4–14 22.2% 1,483 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% 1,477 0 1
25 1983 20–14 58.8% 1,757 0 1
26 1984 13–24 35.1% 1,667 0 1
27 1985 13–18 41.9% 1,724 0 1
28 1986 2–4 33.3% 1,677 0 1
29 1987 0–4 0.0% 1,629 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Jones Catrin Jexell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1980 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1981 5 5 10 50.0%
19 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
21 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1987 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7%
27 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
28 1986 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
Career 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4% 12 14 26 46.2% 25 25 50 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Jones Catrin Jexell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1979 1474 98.1 20.0% -2.40 0–1 -0.04
17 1980 1545 112.9 +51 57.1% +0.33 1–0 1–1 +0.44
18 1981 1545 105.9 +71 46.9% -0.41 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.3 +1.08
19 1982 1661 113.2 -96 +61 -48 60.8% +0.71 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 +2.02
20 1978 1506 102.4 50.0% -0.75 -0.08 1983 1649 120.8 +19 +52 -106 43.8% -0.38 2–4 (33%) 2–6 (25%) 96.3 +0.89
21 1979 1490 +0.09 1984 1537 103.2 +36 +101 27.9% -1.35 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) +1.37
22 1980 1423 94.6 +36 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.50 1985 1491 107.6 +104 +58 32.0% -0.96 1–2 (33%) +0.79
23 1981 1459 107.5 +44 +75 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 +1.50
24 1982 1484 103.7 -68 -7 +110 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.59 1987 1477 97.7 33.3% -2.00 0–1 +0.16
25 1983 1758 131.9 -40 -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.43
26 1984 1667 132.6 +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.22
27 1985 1725 135.5 -10 -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.52
28 1986 1677 104.5 -12 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.70
29 1987 1629 103.9 -23 11.1% -2.67 0–1 -0.24
Career 1801 126.3 -7 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.88 1737 114.4 +17 +67 -67 44.3% -0.39 12–16 (43%) 9–13 (41%) 95.4 +6.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.