H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Kim Jones vs Debbie Spence Nasim H2H: 0-2

Debbie Spence Nasim holds a 2–0 lead over Kim Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Debbie Spence Nasim leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Debbie Spence Nasim won the 1987 Wichita round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Jones
USA Age 69
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Debbie Spence Nasim
USA Age 59

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Debbie Spence Nasim 6-2 6-2 Kim Jones Match data Feb 5, 1987* R32 Wichita WTA 250 Carpet
Debbie Spence Nasim 7-5 6-3 Kim Jones Match data Aug 23, 1985* R16 Monticello WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Jones — — — 1,801 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Debbie Spence Nasim — — — 1,827 56 62 47.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Jones Debbie Spence Nasim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1983 4–2 66.7% — 1,565 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1984 9–7 56.2% — 1,649 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1985 25–19 56.8% — 1,777 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1986 13–22 37.1% — 1,619 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 1987 4–11 26.7% — 1,555 0 1
20 1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1989 1–1 50.0% — 1,558 0 1
22 1980 1–10 9.1% — 1,423 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,758 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1984 13–24 35.1% — 1,667 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1985 13–18 41.9% — 1,725 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,677 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,629 0 1 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Jones Debbie Spence Nasim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1565 107.6 — — — — +77 — — 61.5% +0.38 1–0 2–0 — +0.33
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1650 120.6 — — — — +26 -53 — 55.0% +0.22 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.8 +0.64
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1778 141.5 — — — — -52 -20 — 54.7% +0.34 7–4 (64%) 3–6 (33%) 103.0 -1.62
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1619 117.0 — — — — -1 +131 -89 35.5% -1.12 5–1 (83%) 3–3 (50%) 105.9 +0.15
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1555 115.3 — — — — +9 +132 — 29.0% -1.77 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.25
20 1978 1506 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1979 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09 1989 1558 101.4 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.33 1–0 0–1 — +0.19
22 1980 1423 94.6 — — — — +38 — — 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1981 1459 107.5 — — — — +44 +75 — 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1982 1484 104.0 — — — — -68 -7 +112 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1983 1758 132.1 — — — — -40 — -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1984 1668 132.8 — — — — +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1985 1725 135.7 — — — — -9 — -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1986 1678 104.5 — — — — -13 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 1630 104.2 — — — — -23 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1801 126.5 — — — — -6 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.77 — 1828 129.8 — — — — -5 +41 -89 46.5% -0.34 20–10 (67%) 12–13 (48%) 107.8 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.