H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Kim Jones vs Elna Reinach H2H: 0-1

Elna Reinach holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elna Reinach leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elna Reinach won the 1986 US Open round of 128 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Jones
USA Age 69
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Elna Reinach
RSA Age 57

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elna Reinach #90 6-3 6-4 Kim Jones Match data Aug 28, 1986* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Jones — — — 1,801 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Elna Reinach — #26 33 1,864 145 171 45.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Jones Elna Reinach
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1984 0–1 0.0% #273 1,495 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1985 0–1 0.0% #205 1,494 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1986 14–12 53.8% #56 1,656 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1987 10–21 32.3% #95 1,631 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1988 26–15 63.4% #28 1,810 0 0
20 1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0 1989 16–17 48.5% #56 1,775 0 0
21 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1990 12–18 40.0% #90 1,714 0 0
22 1980 1–10 9.1% — 1,423 0 0 1991 15–22 40.5% #82 1,705 0 0
23 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,459 0 0 1992 10–17 37.0% #109 1,654 0 0
24 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,483 0 0 1993 19–17 52.8% #58 1,706 0 1
25 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,758 0 1 1994 13–15 46.4% #74 1,730 0 1
26 1984 13–24 35.1% — 1,667 0 1 1995 10–15 40.0% #109 1,665 0 1
27 1985 13–18 41.9% — 1,725 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,677 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,629 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Jones Elna Reinach
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 9 5 14 64.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 13 6 19 68.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 7 8 15 46.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 9 10 19 47.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 8 14 22 36.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1992 6 9 15 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1993 12 9 21 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7% 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1985 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1986 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4% — 78 83 161 48.4% 19 37 56 33.9% 37 34 71 52.1% 11 17 28 39.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Jones Elna Reinach
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1496 104.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1494 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.20
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1657 129.7 — — — — +23 -92 -84 53.6% +0.25 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.2 +0.56
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1632 140.3 — — — — +4 -124 +12 39.7% -0.55 2–9 (18%) 1–4 (20%) 93.7 -2.90
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1810 145.0 — — — — -44 -214 -80 60.0% +0.77 8–5 (62%) 5–4 (56%) 105.9 -0.62
20 1978 1506 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.08 1989 1775 141.0 — — — — -7 -178 -39 48.7% -0.08 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.3 -1.35
21 1979 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09 1990 1714 130.8 — — — — +26 -203 +61 44.4% -0.33 4–8 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 95.9 -0.55
22 1980 1423 94.6 — — — — +38 — — 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.48 1991 1706 139.8 — — — — -53 -77 +48 44.4% -0.41 6–10 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 99.3 -3.80
23 1981 1459 107.5 — — — — +44 +75 — 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +1.57 1992 1655 132.3 — — — — +4 -67 +80 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 -1.31
24 1982 1484 104.0 — — — — -68 -7 +112 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.61 1993 1706 131.0 — — — — +28 -124 +17 52.4% +0.13 6–6 (50%) 1–8 (11%) 94.7 +0.42
25 1983 1758 132.1 — — — — -40 — -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.44 1994 1731 133.2 — — — — -3 — +12 43.1% -0.62 7–4 (64%) 2–1 (67%) 104.6 -1.92
26 1984 1668 132.8 — — — — +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.14 1995 1666 126.3 — — — — 0 -139 +127 39.3% -0.46 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.1 -1.57
27 1985 1725 135.7 — — — — -9 — -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1986 1678 104.5 — — — — -13 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 1630 104.2 — — — — -23 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1801 126.5 — — — — -6 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.77 — 1864 143.2 — — — — -4 -139 +16 46.6% -0.19 47–58 (45%) 23–30 (43%) 98.0 -4.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.