H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kim Jones vs Elna Reinach H2H: 0-1
Elna Reinach holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elna Reinach leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elna Reinach won the 1986 US Open first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1986* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Elna Reinach | 6-3 6-4 | Kim Jones | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Jones | — | — | — | 1,801 | 60 | 103 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Elna Reinach | #342 | #26 | 33 | 1,865 | 145 | 170 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Jones | Elna Reinach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #95 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #56 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #109 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 4–14 | 22.2% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1984 | 13–24 | 35.1% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1985 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |